Blisters are much employed in medicine on the cutaneous organ, to dispel, according to some, the morbific humour, and overcome, according to others, a natural irritation by an artificial one. Why should we not also in many cases irritate the mucous surfaces? why not act upon the pituitary membrane, upon the glans penis, upon the membrane of the urethra, upon the pharynx, &c. and especially upon the uvula which is so sensible? why, instead of epispastics upon the perineum and sacrum, should we not introduce a sound into the urethra for a paralysis of the bladder? Instead of acting in hemiplegia upon the cutaneous organ, I have already twice employed the following means; I have introduced a sound into the urethra, one in each nasal fossa, and at the same time, a surgeon irritated at intervals the uvula; the patients appeared to be much more excited than by blisters. Very strong purgative enemas and emetics prove the advantage of the excitement of the mucous membranes in this case. Would it not often be better in ophthalmia, to produce an artificial catarrh in the nostril of the diseased side, than to put a blister or seton in the neck? I have once tried it; it did not succeed; but the ophthalmia was of long standing; I propose to repeat these experiments at the Hôtel Dieu upon a great number of patients. I think that we might often in diseases make use of mucous excitements instead of cutaneous, with much more advantage, because in the mucous system the contact of a body is sufficient, and it is not necessary to produce, by removing the epidermis, a kind of ulcer.