An important question presents itself in the history of the vascular system of the mucous membranes, viz. whether this system admits more or less blood according to different circumstances. As the organs within which these membranes are spread, are almost all susceptible of contraction and dilatation, as we see in the stomach, the intestines, the bladder, &c. it has been thought that during the dilatation, the vessels being more expanded, receive more blood, and that during the contraction on the contrary, being folded up, as it were choaked, they admit but a small quantity of this fluid which then flows into the neighbouring organs. Chaussier has made an application of these principles to the stomach, whose circulation he has considered as being alternately inverse of that of the omentum, which receives during the vacuity of this organ, the blood which this when it is contracted cannot admit. An analogous use has also been attributed to the spleen since the time of Lieutaud. The following is what the inspection of animals opened during abstinence and at different periods of digestion, has shown me upon this point. 1st. During the fulness of the stomach the vessels are more apparent on the exterior of this viscus, than when it is empty. Within, the mucous surface is not more red, sometimes it has appeared to me to be less so. 2d. The omentum, less extended during the fulness of the stomach, exhibits nearly the same number of vessels, as long, but more tortuous, than when it is empty. If they contain less blood, the difference is hardly sensible. I would observe, that in order to distinguish this well, it is necessary to take care that in opening the animal, the blood does not fall on the omentum which presents itself, and thus prevent its state from being ascertained. This is besides a necessary consequence of the arrangement of the vascular system of the stomach. In fact the great stomachic coronary being situated transversely between it and the omentum, and furnishing branches to each, it is evident that when the stomach is lodged between the layers of the omentum by separating these layers, and this by applying itself upon it becomes shorter; it is evident, I say, that the branches which it receives from the coronary cannot be equally applied to it also. In order to do this, it would be necessary that they should go from one to the other without the intermediate trunk that cuts them at right angles; then, in distending, the stomach would separate them as it does the omentum, and would be lodged between them; whereas it pushes them before it with their common trunk, the stomachic coronary, and makes them fold. 3d. I am confident that there is no such constant relation between the size of the spleen and the emptiness or fulness of the stomach, and that these two circumstances coincide necessarily, and that if the first organ increases or diminishes under different circumstances, it is not always precisely the reverse of the stomach.