General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great BritainPeters, Samuel
History
General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great Britain
Peters, Samuel
Connecticut -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Connecticut -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
Notwithstanding the remonstrance of the court at New Haven,
their appeal to King Charles II., and the engagements of
Governor Winthrop, Connecticut pursued the affair of a union
in the same manner in which it was begun. At a session of
the General Assembly, August 19, 1663, a committee was again
appointed to treat with their friends at New Haven, Milford,
Guilford, and Branford, relative to their incorporation with
Connecticut. Provided they could not effect a union by
treaty, they were authorized to read the Charter publicly at
New Haven, and to make declaration to the people there that
the Assembly could not but resent their proceedings as a
distinct jurisdiction, since they were evidently included
within the limits of the Charter granted to the corporation
of Connecticut. They were instructed to proclaim that the
Assembly did desire, and could not but expect, that the
inhabitants of the above towns would yield subjection to the
government of Connecticut.
At a meeting of the commissioners in September in the same
year, New Haven was owned by the colonies as a distinct
confederation. Governor Leet and Mr. Fenn, who had been sent
from that jurisdiction, exhibited a complaint against
Connecticut for the injuries they had done, by encroaching
upon their rights, receiving their members under their
government, and encouraging them to disown their authority,
to disregard their oath of allegiance, and to refuse all
attendance on their courts. They further complained that
Connecticut had appointed constables in several of their
towns, to the great disquiet and injury of the colony. They
prayed that effectual measures might be taken to redress
their grievances, to prevent further injuries, and secure
their rights as a distinct confederation.
Governor Winthrop and Mr. John Talcott, commissioners from
Connecticut, replied that, in their opinion, New Haven had
no just grounds of complaint; that Connecticut had never
designed them any injury, but had made to them the most
friendly propositions, inviting them to share with them
freely in all the important and distinguishing privileges
which they had obtained for themselves; that they had sent
committees amicably to treat with them; that they were still
treating, and would attend all just and friendly means of
accommodation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account