General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great BritainPeters, Samuel
History
General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great Britain
Peters, Samuel
Connecticut -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Connecticut -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
both foreign and intestine enemies, has cost us much
expense of treasure and blood; yet in the second year of
the reign of his late Majesty, King James II., we had a
_quo warranto_ served upon us by Edward Randolph,
requiring our appearance before his Majesty’s court in
England; and although the time of our appearance was
elapsed before the serving the said _quo warranto_, yet we
humbly petitioned his Majesty for his favour and the
continuance of our Charter, with the privileges thereof;
but we received no other favour but a second QUO WARRANTO:
and we well observed that the Charter of London, and of
other considerable cities in England, were condemned, and
that the Charter of Massachusets had undergone the like
fate, plainly saw what we might expect; yet as we not
judged it good or lawful to be active in surrendering what
had cost us so dear, nor to be altogether silent, we
employed an attorney to appear in our behalf, and to
prefer our humble address to his Majesty, to entreat his
favour quickly upon it; but as Sir Edmund Andros informed
us he was empowered by his Majesty to regain the surrender
of our Charter, if we saw meet to do so, and to take
ourselves under his government, we withstood all these
motions, and in our reiterated addresses we petitioned his
Majesty to continue us in the full and free enjoyment of
our liberties and property, civil and sacred, according to
our Charter. We also petitioned that if his Majesty should
not see meet to continue us as we were, but was resolved
to annex us to some other government, we then desired that
(inasmuch as Boston had been our old correspondents, and
people whose principles and manners we had been acquainted
with) we might be annexed rather to Sir Edmund Andros his
government than to Colonel Dungan’s, which choice of ours
was taken for a resignation of our government; though that
was never intended by us for such, nor had it the
formalities in law to make it a resignation, as we humbly
conceive; yet Sir Edmund Andros was commissioned by his
Majesty to take us under his government: pursuant to
which, about the end of October, 1687, he, with a company
of gentlemen and grenadiers to the number of sixty or
upward, came to Hertford (the chief seat of this
government), caused his commission to be read, and
declared our government to be dissolved, and put into
commission both civil and military officers through our
colony, as he pleased, when he passed through the
principal parts thereof.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account