General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great BritainPeters, Samuel
History
General History of Connecticut, from Its First Settlement Under George Fenwick to its Latest Period of Amity with Great Britain
Peters, Samuel
Connecticut -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Connecticut -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
“Per order of the General Court of Connecticut.
“[Signed] JOHN ALLEN, _Secretary_.”
[29] Dr. Douglas was a naturalist, and a physician of
considerable eminence in Boston, where he never attended any
religious worship, having been educated in Scotland with
such rancorous hatred against episcopacy, that, with his
age, it ripened into open scepticism and deism. However, his
many severities against the Episcopalians, New Lights, and
Quakers, procured him a good name among the Old Lights, and
the mongrel christians of New-York, whose policy and
self-interest have always domineered over conscience and
morality. For these reasons, his brother Smith, in his
History of New-York, frequently quotes him, to prove his
futile assertions against New-England, New-Jersey, and
Pensylvania.
[30] Perhaps their success was facilitated by the
consideration, that the quit-rent payable to the Crown in
New-York is 2_s._ 6_d._ per 100 acres, but only 9_d._ in
Newhampshire. The same may be said, with still more reason,
in regard to the lands acquired by New-York from
Massachusets-Bay and Connecticut, where the quit-rent
is--nothing.
[31] In 1680, the number of Indians, or aborigines, in the
whole Province of Connecticut was 4000. This was allowed by
the General Assembly. How much greater their number was in
1637, may be estimated from the accounts given by Dr.
Mather, Mr. Neal, Mr. Penhallow, and Mr. Hutchinson, of the
deaths of Englishmen in the Indian wars, for the space of
forty-three years. It has been computed, that from 1637 to
1680, upon an average, one hundred Englishmen were killed
yearly in those wars, and that there were killed, with sword
and gun, and smallpox, twenty Indians for every one
Englishman. If this calculation is just, it appears that the
English killed of the Indians, during the above-mentioned
period, 86,000, to which number the 4000 Indians remaining
in 1680 being added, it is clear that there were 90,000
Indians in Connecticut when Hooker began his holy war upon
them; not to form conjectures upon those who probably
afterwards abandoned the country. This evinces the weakness
of the Indian mode of fighting with bows and arrows against
guns, and the impropriety of calling Connecticut an howling
wilderness in 1636, when Hooker arrived in Hertford. The
English in one hundred and thirty-six years have not much
more than doubled the number of Indians they killed in
forty-three years. In 1770 the number of Indians in
Connecticut amounted not to 400 souls.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account