Geoffrey de Mandeville: A study of the AnarchyRound, John Horace
History
Geoffrey de Mandeville: A study of the Anarchy
Round, John Horace
Great Britain -- History -- Stephen, 1135-1154; Mandeville, Geoffrey de, earl of Essex, -1144
"Stephen also would have a court of great earls, but in trying to make
himself friends he raised up persistent enemies. He raised new men to
new earldoms, but as he had no spare domains to bestow, he endowed them
with pensions charged on the Exchequer ... the new and unsubstantial
earldoms provoked the real earls to further hostility; and the newly
created lords demanded of the king new privileges as the reward and
security for their continued services" (_Early Plants._, p. 19).[801]
Now, these "pensions on the Exchequer" must, I fear, be dismissed at
once as having an existence only in a misapprehension of the writer.
Indeed, if the Exchequer machinery had broken down, as he holds, it is
difficult to see of what value these pensions would be. But in any case,
it is absolutely certain that such grants as were made were alienations
of lands and rents, and not "pensions" at all.[802] The passages bearing
on these grants are as follows. Robert de Torigny (_alias_ "De Monte")
states that Stephen "omnia pene ad fiscum pertinentia minus caute
distribuerat," and that Henry, on his accession, "cœpit revocare
in jus proprium urbes, castella, villas, quæ ad coronam regni
pertinebant."[803] William of Newburgh writes:—
"Considerans autem Rex [Henricus] quod regii redditus breves essent,
qui avito tempore uberes fuerant, eo quod regia dominica per mollitiem
regis Stephani ad alia multosque dominos majori ex parte migrassent,
præcepit ea cum omni integritate a quibuscunque detentioribus
resignari, et in jus statumque pristinum revocari."
In the vigorous words of William of Malmesbury:—
"Multi siquidem ... a rege, hi prædia, hi castella, postremo quæcumque
semel collibuisset, petere non verebantur; ... Denique multos etiam
comites, qui ante non fuerant, instituit, applicitis possessionibus et
redditibus quæ proprio jure regi competebant."
It is on this last passage that Dr. Stubbs specially relies; but a
careful comparison of this with the two preceding extracts will show
that in none of them are "pensions" spoken of. The grants, as indeed
charters prove, always consisted of actual estates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account