Geological Observations on South AmericaDarwin, Charles
Science
Geological Observations on South America
Darwin, Charles
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Geology -- South America; Mollusks, Fossil -- South America; Paleontology
Knowing from the researches of Professor E. Forbes, that molluscous
animals chiefly abound within a depth of 100 fathoms and under, and
bearing in mind how many thousand miles of both coasts of South America
have been upraised within the recent period by a slow, long-continued,
intermittent movement,—seeing the diversity in nature of the shores and
the number of shells now living on them,—seeing also that the sea off
Patagonia and off many parts of Chile, was during the tertiary period
highly favourable to the accumulation of sediment,—the absence of
extensive deposits including recent shells over these vast spaces of
coast is highly remarkable. The conchiferous calcareous beds at
Coquimbo, and at a few isolated points northward, offer the most marked
exception to this statement; for these beds are from twenty to thirty
feet in thickness, and they stretch for some miles along shore,
attaining, however, only a very trifling breadth. At Valdivia there is
some sandstone with imperfect casts of shells, which POSSIBLY may
belong to the recent period: parts of the boulder formation and the
shingle-beds on the lower plains of Patagonia probably belong to this
same period, but neither are fossiliferous: it also so happens that the
great Pampean formation does not include, with the exception of the
Azara, any mollusca. There cannot be the smallest doubt that the
upraised shells along the shores of the Atlantic and Pacific, whether
lying on the bare surface, or embedded in mould or in sand-hillocks,
will in the course of ages be destroyed by alluvial action: this
probably will be the case even with the calcareous beds of Coquimbo, so
liable to dissolution by rain-water. If we take into consideration the
probability of oscillations of level and the consequent action of the
tidal-waves at different heights, their destruction will appear almost
certain. Looking to an epoch as far distant in futurity as we now are
from the past Miocene period, there seems to me scarcely a chance,
under existing conditions, of the numerous shells now living in those
zones of depths most fertile in life, and found exclusively on the
western and south-eastern coasts of South America, being preserved to
this imaginary distant epoch. A whole conchological series will in time
be swept away, with no memorials of their existence preserved in the
earth’s crust.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account