Geological Observations on South AmericaDarwin, Charles
Science
Geological Observations on South America
Darwin, Charles
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Geology -- South America; Mollusks, Fossil -- South America; Paleontology
Julian, sixty miles to the north, shells are numerous at the foot of
the ninety feet plain (formed by the denudation of the 950 feet plain),
and likewise occasionally at the height of several hundred feet in the
upper strata; these shells must have lived in water somewhere between
five and fifty fathoms in depth. Although in other parts of Patagonia I
have no direct evidence of shoal-water shells having been buried under
a great thickness of superincumbent submarine strata, yet it should be
borne in mind that the lower fossiliferous strata with several of the
same species of Mollusca, the upper tufaceous beds, and the high
summit-plain, stretch for a considerable distance southward, and for
hundreds of miles northward; seeing this uniformity of structure, I
conceive it may be fairly concluded that the subsidence by which the
shells at Santa Cruz and S. Julian were carried down and covered up,
was not confined to these two points, but was co-extensive with a
considerable portion of the Patagonian tertiary formation. In a
succeeding chapter it will be seen, that we are led to a similar
conclusion with respect to the secondary fossiliferous strata of the
Cordillera, namely, that they also were deposited during a long-
continued and great period of subsidence. From the foregoing reasoning,
and from the facts just given, I think we must admit the probability of
the following proposition: namely, that when the bed of the sea is
either stationary or rising, circumstances are far less favourable,
than when the level is sinking, to the accumulation of CONCHIFEROUS
deposits of sufficient thickness and extension to resist, when
upheaved, the average vast amount of denudation. This result appears to
me, in several respects, very interesting: every one is at first
inclined to believe that at innumerable points, wherever there is a
supply of sediment, fossiliferous strata are now forming, which at some
future distant epoch will be upheaved and preserved; but on the views
above given, we must conclude that this is far from being the case; on
the contrary, we require (1st), a long-continued supply of sediment;
(2nd), an extensive shallow area; and (3rd), that this area shall
slowly subside to a great depth, so as to admit the accumulation of a
widely extended thick mass of superincumbent strata. In how few parts
of the world, probably, do these conditions at the present day concur!
We can thus, also, understand the general want of that close sequence
in fossiliferous formations which we might theoretically have
anticipated; for, without we suppose a subsiding movement to go on at
the same spot during an enormous period, from one geological era to
another, and during the whole of this period sediment to accumulate at
the proper rate, so that the depth should not become too great for the
continued existence of molluscous animals, it is scarcely possible that
there should be a perfect sequence at the same spot in the fossil
shells of the two geological formations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account