Geological Observations on South AmericaDarwin, Charles
Science
Geological Observations on South America
Darwin, Charles
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Geology -- South America; Mollusks, Fossil -- South America; Paleontology
The beds of gypsum, together with the red alternating sandstones and
conglomerates, present so perfect and curious a resemblance with those
seen in our former section in the basin-valley of Yeso, that I cannot
doubt the identity of the two formations: I may add, that a little
westward of the P. del Inca, a mass of gypsum passed into a
fine-grained, hard, brown sandstone, which contained some layers of
black, calcareous, compact, shaly rock, precisely like that seen in
such vast masses on the Peuquenes range.
Near the Puente del Inca, numerous fragments of limestone, containing
some fossil remains, were scattered on the ground: these fragments so
perfectly resemble the limestone of bed No. 3, in which I saw
impressions of shells, that I have no doubt they have fallen from it.
The yellow magnesian limestone of bed No. 10, which also includes
traces of shells, has a different appearance. These fossils (as named
by M. d’Orbigny) consist of:—
Gryphaea, near to G. Couloni (Neocomian formation). Arca, perhaps A.
Gabrielis, d’Orbigny, “Pal. Franc.” (Neocomian formation).
Mr. Pentland made a collection of shells from this same spot, and Von
Buch considers them as consisting of:—
Trigonia, resembling in form T. costata. Pholadomya, like one found by
M. Dufresnoy near Alencon. Isocardi excentrica, Voltz., identical with
that from the Jura. (“Description Phys. des Iles Can.” page 472.)
Two of these shells, namely, the Gryphaea and Trigonia, appear to be
identical with species collected by Meyen and myself on the Peuquenes
range; and in the opinion of Von Buch and M. d’Orbigny, the two
formations belong to the same age. I must here add, that Professor E.
Forbes, who has examined my specimens from this place and from the
Peuquenes range, has likewise a strong impression that they indicate
the Cretaceous period, and probably an early epoch in it: so that all
the palaeontologists who have seen these fossils nearly coincide in
opinion regarding their age. The limestone, however, with these fossils
here lies at the very base of the formation, just above the porphyritic
conglomerate, and certainly several thousand feet lower in the series,
than the equivalent, fossiliferous, black, shaly rocks high up on the
Peuquenes range.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account