Geological Observations on South AmericaDarwin, Charles
Science
Geological Observations on South America
Darwin, Charles
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Geology -- South America; Mollusks, Fossil -- South America; Paleontology
about the same level. The longest stump stood seven feet out of the
ground: the roots, if they are still preserved, are buried and
concealed. No one layer of the mudstone appeared much darker than the
others, as if it had formerly existed as soil, nor could this be
expected, for the same agents which replaced with silex and lime the
wood of the trees, would naturally have removed all vegetable matter
from the soil. Besides the fifty-two upright trees, there were a few
fragments, like broken branches, horizontally embedded. The surrounding
strata are crossed by veins of carbonate of lime, agate, and oxide of
iron; and a poor gold vein has been worked not far from the trees.
The green and brown mudstone beds including the trees, are conformably
covered by much indurated, compact, white or ferruginous tuffs, which
pass upwards into a fine-grained, purplish sedimentary rock: these
strata, which, together, are from four to five hundred feet in
thickness, rest on a thick bed of submarine lava, and are conformably
covered by another great mass of fine-grained basalt, which I estimated
at 1,000 feet in thickness, and which probably has been formed by more
than one stream. (This rock is quite black, and fuses into a black
bead, attracted strongly by the magnet; it breaks with a conchoidal
fracture; the included crystals of augite are distinguishable by the
naked eye, but are not perfect enough to be measured: there are many
minute acicular crystals of glassy feldspar.) Above this mass I could
clearly distinguish five conformable alternations, each several hundred
feet in thickness, of stratified sedimentary rocks and lavas, such as
have been previously described. Certainly the upright trees have been
buried under several thousand feet in thickness of matter, accumulated
under the sea. As the trees obviously must once have grown on dry land,
what an enormous amount of subsidence is thus indicated! Nevertheless,
had it not been for the trees there was no appearance which would have
led any one even to have conjectured that these strata had subsided. As
the land, moreover, on which the trees grew, is formed of subaqueous
deposits, of nearly if not quite equal thickness with the
superincumbent strata, and as these deposits are regularly stratified
and fine-grained, not like the matter thrown up on a sea-beach, a
previous upward movement, aided no doubt by the great accumulation of
lavas and sediment, is also indicated. (At first I imagined, that the
strata with the trees might have been accumulated in a lake: but this
seems highly improbable; for, first, a very deep lake was necessary to
receive the matter below the trees, then it must have been drained for
their growth, and afterwards re-formed and made profoundly deep, so as
to receive a subsequent accumulation of matter SEVERAL THOUSAND feet in
thickness. And all this must have taken place necessarily before the
formation of the Uspallata range, and therefore on the margin of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account