Geology, Vol. 1 [of 3] : $b Geologic processes and their resultsSalisbury, Rollin D.
Science
Geology, Vol. 1 [of 3] : $b Geologic processes and their results
Salisbury, Rollin D.
Geology
The straightening of the channel is often accomplished in another way.
Even before the meanders reach the stage represented by Fig. 1, Plate
XVI, the position of the channel becomes unstable. In time of flood,
the whole flat is covered with flowing water. The greater depth of
water in the channel tends to give it a velocity greater than that of
the water on the flat outside. But the distance from _a_ to _c via b_
(Fig. 181) is much greater than that in a direct line. It follows that
the slope from _a_ to _c_ direct is greater than that by way of _b_. If
the current between _a_ and _c_ in time of flood be strong enough to
erode, it may deepen its bed, and thereby increase the volume of water
following this course. The increased volume gives increased velocity,
and the result may be the opening of a channel between _a_ and _c_
direct. The channel may be worn so deep that when the flood subsides,
the stream will follow it. So long as the abandoned channel-curve
remains unfilled with sediment, it is often called a _cut-off_. If
it contains standing water and has the proper form, it is called an
_ox-bow lake_ (Fig. 182), or sometimes a _bayou_. The water-filled
portions are not always bows (Fig. 183, Osage River, near Butler, Mo.).
Cut-offs, with or without standing water, are of common occurrence
along most rivers with wide plains. Meandering is not confined to
streams which are near sea-level. Even small creeks at high altitudes
may meander, if so situated as to have slight velocity. Trout Creek in
the Yellowstone Park (Fig. 184) is an example.
[Illustration: +Fig.+ 181.—Diagram illustrating later stages in the
development of meanders.]
[Illustration: +Fig.+ 182.—Meanders and cut-offs (ox-bow lakes) in
the Mississippi Valley a little below Vicksburg. The figure also
shows the migration of meanders down-stream, and their tendency to
increase themselves. (From charts Nos. 18 and 19, Mississippi River
Commission.)]
[Illustration: +Fig.+ 183.—Bayou Lakes, Osage River, near Butler, Mo.]
There seems to be some relation between the width of the belt within
which a stream meanders, and the width of the stream itself. Recently
it has been estimated that the ratio between them is 18 : 1.[72]
During the development of the meanders it is to be noted that lateral
planation on the one side of a stream is accompanied by deposition on
the other. This is _cut-and-fill_. The sediment eroded from the curve
which is concave toward the stream is shifted down-stream, while that
deposited in the curve which is convex toward the stream is brought
down from above. Thus even in the development of meanders, the material
which is dislodged is shifted down-stream. Since the current directed
against the down-stream side of a growing meander is on the average
stronger than that directed against the opposite side, the meander
itself has a tendency to migrate down-stream (Fig. 182).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account