Geology, Vol. 1 [of 3] : $b Geologic processes and their resultsSalisbury, Rollin D.
Science
Geology, Vol. 1 [of 3] : $b Geologic processes and their results
Salisbury, Rollin D.
Geology
Of the foregoing types of glaciers, the ice-caps far exceed all others
both in size and importance, while the valley glaciers out-rank, in the
same respects, the other types; but since the valley glaciers are the
most familiar type, the general phenomena of glaciers will be discussed
with primary reference to them.
THE GENERAL PHENOMENA OF GLACIERS.[125]
=Dimensions.=—Glaciers which occupy valleys leading down from
snow-fields sometimes reach the upper parts of the valleys only,
sometimes extend through them, and sometimes push out on the plain
beyond. In length they range from a fraction of a mile to many
miles, and though their width is usually much less than their length,
the reverse is sometimes the case (Figs. 233, 234, and 235). Their
thickness is usually measured by hundreds of feet rather than by
denominations of other orders, but the variation is great, and exact
measurements are almost wholly wanting. The minimum thickness is that
necessary to cause movement, and this varies with the slope, the
temperature, and other conditions. There is also much variation in the
thickness in different parts of a glacier. As a rule, it is thinnest in
its terminal portion, and thickest at some point intermediate between
this and its source, but nearer the latter than the former. Cliff and
reconstructed glaciers are comparable in size to the smaller valley
glaciers. Piedmont glaciers may attain greater size.
[Illustration: +Fig.+ 235.—A glacier in the Cascades near Cascade Pass,
Wash. A glacier intermediate between a cliff glacier and a valley
glacier. (Willis, U. S. Geol. Surv.)]
An ice-cap is theoretically thickest at its center and thins away to
its borders, but its actual dimensions are influenced by the topography
on which it is developed. The Greenland ice-cap is known to rise about
9000 feet above the sea, and it probably reaches considerably higher
than this in the unexplored center of its broad dome. The height of the
land surface beneath is unknown, but it is unlikely that it averages
half this amount, and hence the ice is probably 5000 feet or more thick
in the center. There is reason to think that it is much thicker in
Antarctica.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account