Geology, Vol. 1 [of 3] : $b Geologic processes and their resultsSalisbury, Rollin D.
Science
Geology, Vol. 1 [of 3] : $b Geologic processes and their results
Salisbury, Rollin D.
Geology
It is merely necessary to assume that the gravity of the accumulated
mass is sufficient to produce the minute temporary liquefaction at the
points of greatest stress, the result being accomplished not so much
by the lowering of the melting-point as by the development of heat by
pressure.
[Illustration: +Fig.+ 292.—Portion of the east face of Bowdoin glacier,
North Greenland, showing oblique upward thrust, with shear.]
This conception of glacial “flowage” involves only the _momentary
liquefaction of minute portions of the mass_, while the ice as a whole
remains rigid, as its crystalline nature requires. Instead of assigning
a slow viscous fluidity like that of asphalt to the _whole_ mass, which
seems inconsistent with its crystalline character, it assigns a free
fluidity to a succession of particles that form only a minute fraction
of the whole at any instant.
This conception is consistent with the retention of the granular
condition of the ice, with the heterogeneous (in the main) orientation
of the crystals, with the rigidity and brittleness of the ice, and with
its strictly crystalline character, a character which a viscous liquid
does not possess however much its high viscosity may make it resemble a
rigid body.
=Accumulated motion in the terminal part of a glacier.=—However slight
the relative motion of one granule on its neighbor, the granules in any
part of a glacier partake in the accumulated motion of all parts nearer
the source, and hence all are thrust forward. Herein appears to lie the
distinctive nature of glacial movement. Each part of a stream of water
feels the hydrostatic pressure of neighboring parts (theoretically
equal in _all_ directions) and the momentum of motion, but not the
rigid thrust of the mass behind. Lava streams are good types of viscous
fluids flowing in masses comparable to those of glaciers and on similar
slopes, and, in their last stages, at similar rates, but their special
modes of flow and their effects on the sides and bottoms of their paths
are radically different from those of glaciers. Forceful abrasion, and
particularly the rigid holding of imbedded stones while they score and
groove the rock beneath, is unknown in lava streams and is scarcely
conceivable. There is, so far as we know, no experimental or natural
evidence that any typical viscous body in flowing over a rugose bottom
detaches and picks up fragments and holds them as graving tools in its
base so fixedly as to cut deep, long, straight grooves in the hard
bottom over which it flows. It would seem that competency to do this
peculiar class of work, which is distinctive of glaciers, should be
demonstrated before the viscous theory of glacial movement is accepted
as even a good working hypothesis. Somewhat in contrast with viscous
movement, it is conceived that a glacier is thrust forward rigidly by
internal elongation, shears forcibly over its sides and bottoms, and
leaves its distinctive marks upon them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account