Geology, Vol. 1 [of 3] : $b Geologic processes and their resultsSalisbury, Rollin D.
Science
Geology, Vol. 1 [of 3] : $b Geologic processes and their results
Salisbury, Rollin D.
Geology
=Chemical and organic deposits.=—There is no sharp line of distinction
between the deposits usually classed as chemical and those regarded as
organic. The latter are chemical in the broader sense of the term, but
as they are immediately associated with life and are dependent upon it,
it is a matter of practical convenience to separate them. Aside from
the organic deposits, the chemical deposits made in shallow sea-water
embrace (1) those due to reactions between constituents so brought
together that new and insoluble compounds are formed and precipitated,
and (2) those due to evaporation. The points of saturation for the
various substances dissolved in sea-water are reached at different
stages, and hence they are deposited more or less in succession.
The chemical deposits made in the shallow water of the sea, or in
shallow bodies of water isolated from the sea, are chiefly simple
precipitates resulting from evaporation; but new combinations are
sometimes made in the process of concentration and precipitation.
All substances in solution are necessarily precipitated on complete
evaporation, but since the sea-water is in general far from saturation,
so far as all its leading salts are concerned, only a few are
thrown down in quantity sufficient to have geological importance
where evaporation is incomplete. The leading deposits are lime
carbonate (CaCO₃), lime sulphate (gypsum, CaSO₄,2H₂O), common salt
(rock-salt, NaCl), and the magnesium salts, usually the chlorides and
sulphates, which are later changed to carbonates. In investigations
on Mediterranean water[174] which had an initial density of 1.02, no
deposit took place until concentration by evaporation had brought the
water to a specific gravity of 1.05. Between this density and that
of 1.13, lime carbonate and some iron oxide were deposited. Between
1.13 and 1.22, lime sulphate was the most abundant precipitate, while
between 1.22 and 1.31, 95% of the deposit was common salt. With still
further concentration, the remaining substances in solution, especially
the magnesium salts, were thrown down.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account