Giant brains; or, Machines that thinkBerkeley, Edmund Callis
Science
Giant brains; or, Machines that think
Berkeley, Edmund Callis
Computers -- Popular works
To be true or false is a property of a statement. Usually we say that
a statement is true when it expresses a fact. For example, take the
statement “Salt dissolves in water.” We consider this statement to be
true because it expresses a fact. Actually, in this case we can roughly
prove the fact ourselves. We take a bowl, put some water in it, and put
in a little salt. After a while we look into the water and notice that
no salt whatever is to be seen.
Of course, this statement, like many another, occurs in a _context_
where certain things are understood. One of the understandings here,
for example, is “a small amount of salt in a much larger amount of
water.” For if we put a whole bag full of salt in just a little water,
not all the salt will dissolve. Nearly every statement occurs in a
context that we must know if we are to decide whether the statement is
true or false.
LOGICAL TRUTH
Logical truth is different from ordinary truth. With logical truth
we appeal not to facts but to suppositions. Usually we say that a
statement is logically true when it follows logically from certain
suppositions. In other words, we play a game that has useful, even
wonderful, results. The game starts with “if” or “suppose” or “let us
assume.” While the game lasts, any statement is logically true if it
follows logically from the suppositions.
For example, let us take five statements:
1. “The earth is flat like a sheet of paper.”
2. “The earth is round like a ball.”
3. “John Doe travels as fast as he can, without turning
to left or to right, for many days.”
4. “John Doe will fall off the earth.”
5. “John Doe will arrive back at his starting point.”
Let us also take a certain context in which: We know what we mean
by such words as “earth,” “flat,” “falling,” etc.; we have other
statements and understandings such as “if John Doe walks off the edge
of a cliff, he will fall,” “a flat sheet of paper has an edge,” etc.
In this context, if statements 1 and 3 are supposed, then statement
4 is logically true. On the other hand, if statements 2 and 3 are
supposed, then statement 5 is logically true. Of course, for many
centuries, nearly all men believed statement 1; and the importance of
the years 1492 to 1521 (Columbus to Magellan) is linked with the final
proof that statement 2 expresses a fact. So, depending on the game, or
the context, whichever we wish to call it, almost any statement can
be logically true. What we become interested in, therefore, is the
connections between statements which make them _follow logically_.
LOGICAL PATTERNS
Perhaps the most familiar example of “following logically” is a pattern
of words like the following:
1. All igs are ows.
2. All ows are umphs.
3. Therefore, all igs are umphs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account