Gillingwater's History of Lowestoft: a reprint: with a chapter of more recent eventsGillingwater, Edmund
History
Gillingwater's History of Lowestoft: a reprint: with a chapter of more recent events
Gillingwater, Edmund
Lothingland (England); Lowestoft (England)
haven, and therefore were blameable in either refusing or evading them;
what, therefore, rendered the burgesses of Yarmouth so very culpable was,
their unjust and illegal attempts above mentioned (about the 37th of
Elizabeth, and again in 1659) wholly to exclude the town of Lowestoft
from the herring fishery, and to monopolise it to themselves. The
proceedings relative to these designs will appear in the subsequent part
of this section.
The first complaint against the Yarmouth men was that made to the lords
of the privy council, in the year 1595, by the bailiffs and other
inhabitants belonging to the several towns of Ipswich, Colchester,
Dunwich, Orford, Aldborough, Southwold, and Manningtree, in behalf of the
ketchmen, who resorted to Kirkley road and parts adjacent to buy
herrings; signifying the many hardships and inconveniences which they
laboured under from being deprived by the burgesses of Yarmouth of the
ancient privilege they enjoyed, and the great injury they were liable to,
in consequence thereof.
The ketchmen were those vessels which frequented these coasts in the
fishing season for the purpose of buying and selling herrings, which they
transacted in the open sea; but now Yarmouth men were for compelling them
to resort to Kirkley road, in order that they might receive the customs,
grounding their claim upon a grant of Queen Elizabeth.
THE COMPLAINT OF THE KETCHMEN AGAINST YARMOUTH.
Whereas there is a certain grant passed from her majesty to the
township of Great Yarmouth, in the county of Norfolk, as we are
credibly informed, and as the township of Yarmouth aforesaid have
given out speech and reported, That no fishermen, after the feast of
St. Michael, by the space of forty days, should utter or sell any
herrings within the compass or limit of seven miles of the said town,
to any person or persons; but that the said fishermen should be
constrained and urged to utter and sell all such herrings as should
be by them taken within the time before limited at the town of
Yarmouth aforesaid, and there to take and abide their market and
utterance of the same herrings, and not elsewhere. We, therefore,
which hereunder have subscribed, having had due consideration of the
premises, and seeing and proving not only the great damage and
inconvenience that the same will bring to the whole commonwealth of
this realm, but also the utter ruin and destruction that will fall
upon a number of poor ketchmen which be in trade with the said
fishermen, whereby the said ketchmen, their wives and families, as
also a great number of others who are thereby supported, sustained,
and upholden, do think the said grant to be very unprofitable and
inconvenient. The reasons that do move us thereto are these; that is
to say, If the fishermen, after the taking of the said herrings,
shall be constrained to repair, abide, and make their market and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account