Gillingwater's History of Lowestoft: a reprint: with a chapter of more recent eventsGillingwater, Edmund
History
Gillingwater's History of Lowestoft: a reprint: with a chapter of more recent events
Gillingwater, Edmund
Lothingland (England); Lowestoft (England)
The first step taken by the Lowestoft men after their cause was referred
by the House of Lords to the opinion of the judges, was to present a
petition to Sir Robert Foster, Lord Chief Justice of England; and also to
Sir Orlando Bridgeman, Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas;
wherein they represented, that the House of Lords having referred to
their Lordships for their opinion, whether the statute of the 31st of
Edward III be repealed by the statute of the 2nd of Richard II, or by any
other statute; and that their poor petitioners having attended upon this
business for six months, were not able to support the expense thereof, or
to contend any longer with such powerful adversaries as the rich
inhabitants of Yarmouth, who endeavour to weary them out by delays, to
ruin their poor petitioners and the whole western fishery, and monopolise
the whole trade of herring fishing to themselves, to the great prejudice
of the kingdom in general, and of their petitioners in particular.
Therefore they humbly prayed that their Lordships would be graciously
pleased to appoint a day, in order to meet the rest of the judges, that
the counsel on both sides might attend their lordships, and a report of
their opinion be delivered to the parliament as soon as possible.
TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE SIR ROBERT FOSTER, KNT., LORD CHIEF JUSTICE
OF ENGLAND; AND SIR ORLANDO BRIDGEMAN, BART., LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE COMMON PLEAS.
THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE INHABITANTS OF LOWESTOFT IN THE COUNTY OF
SUFFOLK,
Sheweth,
That your poor petitioners having had several hearings before his
Majesty in council, concerning the differences between them and the
rich inhabitants of Yarmouth, respecting the free trade of herring
fishery; who thereupon was pleased to refer the same to the right
honourable the Lords assembled in Parliament, who, upon a full
hearing thereof, were pleased to refer the matter of law to the
reverend judges, to consider whether the statute of 31 Edward III,
ch. i and ii be repealed by the statute 2 Richard II, ch. vii., or by
any other statute, and to report their opinion to the house
accordingly. And your petitioners having awaited six months for
relief, and being quite worn out with expense and attendance, and are
not able any longer to contend with such powerful adversaries, who,
by delays and all other possible means, strive to ruin your poor
petitioners and the whole western fishery, and to monopolise the
whole trade of herring fishing, to the great prejudice of the kingdom
in general, as appears by the certificate of many hundreds of the
western fishermen, the certificate of the fishmongers in London, and
a remonstrance of the burgesses of parliament for the sea coast towns
in the county of Suffolk.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account