Give Me Liberty: The Struggle for Self-Government in VirginiaWertenbaker, Thomas Jefferson
History
Give Me Liberty: The Struggle for Self-Government in Virginia
Wertenbaker, Thomas Jefferson
Virginia -- Politics and government -- To 1775
Blair's answer was to take ship for England, there to lay his complaints
before the English prelates and through them before the Board of Trade.
To the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Bishop of Salisbury, and the Bishop
of London he undoubtedly poured out his complaints of Andros--that he
was an enemy of the college, that he did not support the efforts to
secure better livings for the clergy, that he had disobeyed the King's
express orders to keep him in the Council. This ecclesiastical lobby was
too much for Sir Edmund. Seeing the handwriting on the wall, he wrote
that he wished to come home because of ill health. On May 31, 1698, his
resignation was accepted and Francis Nicholson named to succeed him as
Governor General.[25]
When Andros bade Jamestown goodbye and set sail for England, a full
decade had passed since the Glorious Revolution, time sufficient for one
to judge its effect upon self-government in Virginia. Some of the losses
of the Second Stuart Despotism had not been regained. The act of 1680
giving the Crown a perpetual revenue had not been repealed; the judicial
powers of the Assembly had not been restored; the efforts to secure a
charter for the colony had been abandoned; the Burgesses had not
regained the right to name their clerk.
Yet the gains far outweighed these failures. Of first importance was it
that the Assembly itself had been preserved with most of its rights and
privileges. It still could initiate legislation, it alone could initiate
money bills, it could determine the uses of all appropriated funds, it
could appoint the Treasurer. The petitions of the Assembly to the Throne
were no longer cast aside with scorn as in the days of Charles II and
James II, but were given careful consideration. The battle for liberty
had not yet been won, many bitter struggles lay ahead, but the gains
made under the mild rule of King William and Queen Mary were vital to
the eventual victory.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] _Journals of the House of Burgesses_, 1660-1693: 370.
[2] CO5-1318.
[3] _Journals of the House of Burgesses_, 1660-1693: 352.
[4] _Journals of the House of Burgesses_, 1660-1693: 352.
[5] CO5-1314, Doc. 9.
[6] _Documentary history of New York_ 2: 25, 31, 42, 181-183.
[7] CO5-1306, Doc. 64.
[8] _Executive journals of the Council_ I: 158.
[9] CO5-1306, Doc. 41.
[10] _Sainsbury papers_ 5: 100.
[11] A. T. S. Goodrick, _Edward Randolph_ 7: 430.
[12] _Sainsbury papers_ 5: 165.
[13] A. T. S. Goodrick, _Edward Randolph_ 7: 448.
[14] _Journals of the House of Burgesses_, 1659-1693: 292, 482-493.
[15] _Ibid._, 1695-1702: 9-42.
[16] CO5-1359, p. 79.
[17] _Journals of the House of Burgesses_, 1659-1693: 360.
[18] CO5-1359, pp. 101, 102.
[19] W. W. Hening, _Statutes at large_ 3: 197, 198.
[20] T. J. Wertenbaker, _The first Americans_, 133.
[21] _Sainsbury papers_ 5: 225, 226.
[22] _Ibid._, 236.
[23] _Executive journals of the Council_ I: 350, 352.
[24] _Ibid._, 364.
[25] CO5-1359, p. 208.
CHAPTER VIII
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account