Glaucus; Or, The Wonders of the ShoreKingsley, Charles
History
Glaucus; Or, The Wonders of the Shore
Kingsley, Charles
Natural history -- Juvenile literature; Seashore biology -- Juvenile literature
One sight more, and we have done. I had something to say, had time
permitted, on the ludicrous element which appears here and there in
nature. There are animals, like monkeys and crabs, which seem made to be
laughed at; by those at least who possess that most indefinable of
faculties, the sense of the ridiculous. As long as man possesses muscles
especially formed to enable him to laugh, we have no right to suppose
(with some) that laughter is an accident of our fallen nature; or to find
(with others) the primary cause of the ridiculous in the perception of
unfitness or disharmony. And yet we shrink (whether rightly or wrongly,
we can hardly tell) from attributing a sense of the ludicrous to the
Creator of these forms. It may be a weakness on my part; at least I will
hope it is a reverent one: but till we can find something corresponding
to what we conceive of the Divine Mind in any class of phenomena, it is
perhaps better not to talk about them at all, but observe a stoic
“epoche,” waiting for more light, and yet confessing that our own
laughter is uncontrollable, and therefore we hope not unworthy of us, at
many a strange creature and strange doing which we meet, from the highest
ape to the lowest polype.
But, in the meanwhile, there are animals in which results so strange,
fantastic, even seemingly horrible, are produced, that fallen man may be
pardoned, if he shrinks from them in disgust. That, at least, must be a
consequence of our own wrong state; for everything is beautiful and
perfect in its place. It may be answered, “Yes, in its place; but its
place is not yours. You had no business to look at it, and must pay the
penalty for intermeddling.” I doubt that answer; for surely, if man have
liberty to do anything, he has liberty to search out freely his heavenly
Father’s works; and yet every one seems to have his antipathic animal;
and I know one bred from his childhood to zoology by land and sea, and
bold in asserting, and honest in feeling, that all without exception is
beautiful, who yet cannot, after handling and petting and admiring all
day long every uncouth and venomous beast, avoid a paroxysm of horror at
the sight of the common house-spider. At all events, whether we were
intruding or not, in turning this stone, we must pay a fine for having
done so; for there lies an animal as foul and monstrous to the eye as
“hydra, gorgon, or chimæra dire,” and yet so wondrously fitted to its
work, that we must needs endure for our own instruction to handle and to
look at it. Its name, if you wish for it, is Nemertes; probably N.
Borlasii; {136} a worm of very “low” organization, though well fitted
enough for its own work. You see it? That black, shiny, knotted lump
among the gravel, small enough to be taken up in a dessert spoon. Look
now, as it is raised and its coils drawn out. Three feet—six—nine, at
least: with a capability of seemingly endless expansion; a slimy tape of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account