Glimpses of the dark ages : $b or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth centuryAnonymous
History
Glimpses of the dark ages : $b or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth century
Anonymous
Civilization, Medieval
"We must abandon," says sir Francis Palgrave, "any conjectures as to
the government of the boroughs in the earlier periods. We must rest
satisfied with the fact that, in the reign of the Confessor, the
larger boroughs had assumed the form of communities, which, without
much impropriety, may be described as territorial corporations. The
legal character of the burgess arose from his possessions; it was a
real right, arising from the qualifications which he held. The
burgess was the owner of a tenement within the walls, and the
possession might descend to his heirs, or be freely alienated to a
stranger." The same writer considers that, in some instances, the
possession of land imparted the right of judicature in the borough
mote, or town assembly; but that while such persons were aldermen by
tenure, there were other boroughs which possessed an elective
magistracy. The nature of the Anglo-Saxon institutions has long been
matter of dispute, and considerable doubt surrounds the interesting
subject, which the most diligent and learned antiquaries are unable
to dispel; but, so far as our municipal history is concerned,
probably the twofold view of the organization of the Saxon towns
suggested by sir F. Palgrave, is correct. The towns in which the
tenure of land gave magisterial authority would most likely be the
smaller ones, while elective magistrates would distinguish the larger
communities. The following account by M. Thierry is, perhaps,
accurate:--"The burgesses of London,[1] like those of most of the
larger Anglo-Saxon towns, composed, under the designation of _hause_,
a municipal corporation, which had the privilege of conducting the
government of the city, and regulating its police. The presence of
the king made no difference in its institutions, and the burgesses
might, even without his permission, assemble and deliberate together
on the internal administration of their city."[2] But this account,
we apprehend, must be carefully restricted to the large towns of the
Anglo-Saxons, or it will mislead the reader. Towns in general we
cannot believe had attained to such power and independency. Still,
even the existence of a few such towns, tending as they did to leaven
the mass of the community with their own free sentiments, indicate
the attainment of a no small degree of liberal civilisation by our
Saxon ancestors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account