Glimpses of the Past: History of the River St. John, A.D. 1604-1784Raymond, W. O. (William Odber)
History
Glimpses of the Past: History of the River St. John, A.D. 1604-1784
Raymond, W. O. (William Odber)
New Brunswick -- History; Saint John River Valley (Me. and N.B.)
[31] It would be interesting to know the exact location of the
"portage" referred to above. Was it the rocky neck between
Marble Cove at Indiantown and the Straight Shore? Or was it
the comparatively slight obstruction at Drury's Cove that
prevents the river finding an outlet by way of the Marsh Creek
into Courtenay Bay? See on this head Dr. George F. Matthew's
interesting paper on "The Outlets of the St. John River:" Nat.
Hist. Society bulletin No. xii., p. 42.
A bill was once introduced into the House of Assembly for the purpose
of enabling the promoters to remove, by blasting, the rocks that
obstruct the mouth of the river and thus allow the waters to flow more
freely. It was claimed that many benefits would follow, chiefly that
the lumbermen would be able to get their logs and deals to market more
expeditiously and at less cost, and that the farmers, of Maugerville,
Grand Falls and Sheffield would be saved the serious inconveniences
occasioned by the annual freshet. However, popular sentiment was
strongly opposed to the project. People speedily realized that not
only would the beauty of the river be destroyed but that navigation
would be rendered precarious and uncertain. The project, in fact,
would have changed our noble St. John into a tidal river, unsightly
mud flats alternating with rushing currents of turbid waters, while so
far as protection of the low-lying lands goes the remedy would in all
probability have proved worse than the disease, for instead of an
annual inundation there would have been an inundation at every high
tide. Moreover the harbor at St. John would have been ruined. There
can be no secure harbor at the mouth of a great tidal river where
swirling tides pour in and out twice in the course of every
twenty-four hours.
Cadillac mentions the convenient route to Quebec via the River St.
John. The Indians had used it from time immemorial and the French
followed their example, as at a later period did the English. The
missionaries Le Loutre and de L'Isle-Dieu in the statement prepared by
them in 1753, already mentioned, say:--
"It is very easy to maintain communication with Quebec, winter and
summer alike, by the River St. John, and the route is especially
convenient for detachments of troops needed either for attack or
defence. This is the route to be taken and followed:--
"From Quebec to the River du Loup.
From the River du Loup by a portage of 18 leagues to Lake
Temiscouata.
From Lake Temiscouata to Madaoechka [Madawaska.]
From Madaoechka to Grand Falls.
From Grand Falls to Medoctek.
From Medoctek to Ecouba [Aukpaque], post of the Indians of the
Jesuit missionary, Father Germain.
From Ecouba to Jemsec.
From Jemsec, leaving the River St. John and traversing Dagidemoech
[Washa demoak] lake ascending by the river of the same name,
thence by a portage of 6 leagues to the River Petkoudiak.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account