Good-bye to all that : $b An autobiographyGraves, Robert
History
Good-bye to all that : $b An autobiography
Graves, Robert
Authors, English -- 20th century -- Biography; Graves, Robert, 1895-1985; World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives, British
The dependability of divisions also varied with their seniority
in date of promotion. The latest formed regular divisions and the
second-line territorial divisions, whatever their recruiting area, were
usually inferior. Their senior officers and warrant-officers were not
good enough.
We once discussed which were the cleanest troops in trenches, taken
in nationalities. We agreed on a list like this, in descending order:
English and German Protestants; Northern Irish, Welsh and Canadians;
Irish and German Catholics; Scottish; Mohammedan Indians; Algerians;
Portuguese; Belgians; French. The Belgians and French were put
there for spite; they were not really dirtier than the Algerians or
Portuguese.
Atrocities. Propaganda reports of atrocities were, we agreed,
ridiculous. Atrocities against civilians were surely few. We remembered
that while the Germans were in a position to commit atrocities
against enemy civilians, Germany itself, except for the early Russian
cavalry raid, had never had the enemy on her soil. We no longer
believed accounts of unjustified German atrocities in Belgium; know
the Belgians now at first-hand. By atrocities we meant, specifically,
rape, mutilation and torture, not summary shootings of suspected spies,
harbourers of spies, _francs-tireurs_, or disobedient local officials.
If the atrocity list was to include the accidental-on-purpose
bombing or machine-gunning of civilians from the air, the Allies
were now committing as many atrocities as the Germans. French and
Belgian civilians had often tried to win our sympathy and presents
by exhibiting mutilations of children—stumps of hands and feet, for
instance—representing them as deliberate, fiendish atrocities when they
were merely the result of shell-fire, British or French shell-fire as
likely as not. We did not believe that rape was any more common on the
German side of the line than on the Allied side. It was unnecessary.
Of course, a bully-beef diet, fear of death, and absence of wives made
ample provision of women necessary in the occupied areas. No doubt
the German army authorities provided brothels in the principal French
towns behind the line, as did the French on the Allied side. But the
voluntary system would suffice. We did not believe stories of forcible
enlistment of women.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account