Good Health and How We Won It, With an Account of the New HygieneSinclair, Upton
Science
Good Health and How We Won It, With an Account of the New Hygiene
Sinclair, Upton
Hygiene
“The Department of Agriculture spends seven million dollars on plant
health and animal health every year, but, with the exception of the
splendid work done by Doctors Wiley, Atwater, and Benedict, Congress
does not directly appropriate one cent for promoting the physical
well-being of babies. Thousands have been expended in stamping out
cholera among swine, but not one dollar was ever voted for eradicating
pneumonia among human beings. Hundreds of thousands are consumed
in saving the lives of elm trees from the attacks of beetles; in
warning farmers against blights affecting potato plants; the importing
Sicilian bugs to fertilize fig blossoms in California; in ostracizing
various species of weeds from the ranks of the useful plants, and in
exterminating parasitic growths that prey on fruit trees. In fact,
the Department of Agriculture has expended during the last ten years
over forty-sixmillions of dollars. But not a wheel of the official
machinery at Washington was ever set in motion for the alleviation or
cure of diseases of the heart or kidneys, which will carry off over
six millions of our entire population. Eight millions will perish of
pneumonia, and the entire event is accepted by the American people
with a resignation equal to that of the Hindoo, who, in the midst of
indescribable filth, calmly awaits the day of cholera.
“During the next census period more than six million infants under two
years of age will end their little spans of life while mothers sit by
and watch in utter helplessness. And yet this number could probably be
decreased by as much as half. But nothing is done.
“In the United States alone, of the eighty millions living to-day, all
must die, after having lived, say a little more than three billion,
two hundred million years of life, on the average slightly more than
twoscore years. Of these years, one billion, six hundred million,
represent the unproductive years of childhood and training.
“Consider that the burden of the unproductive years on the productive
years is 20-20, or say 100 per cent. Could the average length of life
be increased to sixty years, say to forty-eight billion years lived by
eighty millions of people, the burden of the unproductive years would
fall to 50 per cent. In the judgment of men competent to hold opinions,
this is not impossible.”
It was the reading of this paper, which led to the formation of the
Committee of One Hundred on National Health, of which Professor Irving
Fisher of Yale is president, and which includes among its members such
men and women as Ex-President Eliot of Harvard, Dr. Lyman Abbott, Miss
Jane Addams, Luther Burbank, Horace Fletcher, Professor Chittenden, Dr.
Kellogg, and Dr. Trudeau.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account