Gossip in the First Decade of Victoria's ReignAshton, John
History
Gossip in the First Decade of Victoria's Reign
Ashton, John
Great Britain -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
“Capt. Reynolds then requested that he might be brought to a
court-martial for the offences for which he had now been charged.
This was also refused, as it was stated Lord Hill had determined it
should be considered as settled. And, as if this was not enough,
Gen. Sleigh told Capt. Reynolds that he had forfeited the sympathy of
every officer of rank in the Service.
“Capt. Reynolds applied for copies of all letters referred to in this
statement, which are not given at length, and was refused them.”
He still kept in the regiment, which, perhaps, was unwise on his part, as
the sequel shows. Early in September, an evening party was given by the
Earl of Cardigan, to which, as usual, several officers of the regiment
were invited. In the course of the evening, a young lady casually
observed, aloud, that she “did not see Capt. Reynolds there.” The Earl
of Cardigan, who happened to be near, heard the remark, and replied, “Oh,
no; he is not one of my visitors.” The words were uttered without any
marked expression, and did not, at the time, attract particular
attention. They were, however, carried to Capt. Reynolds, who,
conceiving that the expression was calculated to affect him as a
gentleman, wrote a letter to the Earl of Cardigan, to know if the
expression had been used, and in what sense. This letter remained
unanswered, and the consequence was, that Capt. Reynolds, stung with this
apparently further slight, was induced to send a second and a stronger
letter, couched in terms which could bear no other interpretation than
that of a challenge.
On receiving this letter, the Earl of Cardigan consulted with his
friends; and, after fairly considering the matter, it was determined to
submit the letters with the whole of the circumstances connected with the
case, to the consideration of the Colonel of the regiment, Prince Albert.
The Prince, on receiving the papers, laid them before the
Commander-in-Chief, Lord Hill, for his opinion thereon, when it was
resolved, by the latter, to let the matter come fairly before the public,
in the shape of a court-martial, which was, shortly afterwards, held at
Brighton. This court confined itself chiefly to the consideration of the
second letter written by Capt. Reynolds, which they conceived to be
couched in a spirit so insubordinate, ungentlemanly, and insolent, as to
afford the writer no sort of excuse, or palliation for his conduct, on
the alleged grounds of previous provocation on the part of his commanding
officer, and they adjudged that Capt. Reynolds should be cashiered (Oct.
20).
It certainly was not from a wish not to fight a duel that Lord Cardigan
thus acted with regard to Capt. Reynolds (and no one who remembers his
heading the charge of the Light Brigade at Balaclava, can question his
courage), for he challenged and fought with Lieut. Tuckett, on 12th Sep.;
a duel which was thus reported in the papers:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account