Gossip in the First Decade of Victoria's ReignAshton, John
History
Gossip in the First Decade of Victoria's Reign
Ashton, John
Great Britain -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED that no Gent be, in future, allowed to
cross a hired horse with a view to ten shillings worth of Sunday
display in the Parks, the turnout being always detected; nor shall be
permitted to drive a gig, in a fierce scarf, under similar
circumstances. Nor shall any Gent imagine that an acquaintance with
all the questionable resorts of London is “knowing life”; or that
trousers of large check pattern are anything but exceeding Gentish.
SAVING ALWAYS that the Gents have not the sense to endeavour
bettering their condition, which is exceedingly probable; under which
circumstances they had better remain as they are, in ignorance of
their melancholy position. But, on the other hand, it is commanded
that people of common intellect, henceforth cease to designate any of
their male friends as “Gents,” the word being one of exceedingly bad
style, and equally objectionable with “genteel,” which is, possibly,
derived from it. And that if, after this, anyone speaks of a “Gent,”
or “Party” he knows, it is ordered that such speaker be immediately
set down as one of the unfortunate class in question.
The Shakspere autograph which was sold on 24 May, 1841, came again into
the market, and was bought on 19 May, for £145, by the Corporation of the
City of London. The _Patres Conscripti_ of the Common Council were not
of one mind as to the eligibility of the purchase. On the motion “that
the Court agree to the report, and that the Chamberlain be instructed to
pay the sum,” Mr. Warton rose to move, as an amendment, that the report
should lie upon the table. (A laugh, and loud cries of “Hear, hear.”)
He had, he said, done all he could in the Committee, to prevail upon the
members that the purchase of the autograph was a most wasteful and
prodigal expenditure. (“Hear, hear,” and “No, no.”) The precedent was a
most mischievous one. If the Court sanctioned such a proceeding as that
which the report had described, by and by the autographs of archbishops
and bishops, and other individuals who had, in times long past,
distinguished themselves, would supply apologies for wasting the City
cash, in order to gratify gentlemen who were afflicted with that
description of mania. (Laughter.) He hoped the Court would not catch
the infection, but second his rational effort to check it, by condemning
the report to its proper station on the table. After all, the document
was doubtful; but there was no doubt at all as to the profligacy of the
expenditure. (Laughter, and cries of “Hear, hear,” and “No, no.”) Mr.
Knott said it was quite ridiculous to think for a moment, of voting £145
for a few doubtful, illegible, almost obliterated scratches of a pen.
(Laughter, and cries of “Hear, hear.”) He defied any man on earth to say
what those scratches represented. On a division there were, for the
motion 41; for the amendment 31.
CHAPTER XXI.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account