Gossip in the First Decade of Victoria's ReignAshton, John
History
Gossip in the First Decade of Victoria's Reign
Ashton, John
Great Britain -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
On the next day (2 May) a terrible accident occurred at the Suspension
bridge at Great Yarmouth. A clown was to emulate Barry’s folly, and
cross the river in a washing-tub drawn by geese; and thousands of people
assembled to see him, of whom a great number (accounts vary from 300 to
600), containing very many children, were on the bridge. Some of the
suspension rods snapped, and the crowd fell into the water. Every
assistance was rendered, but the number of recovered dead bodies, nearly
all children, or young persons, was 77, and many are supposed to have
been swept away by the current.
On the 2nd of May, the famous Excise trial at Bar, _i.e._, before twelve
judges, the Attorney General _v._ Smith, came to an end, after lasting
eight days. Mr. George Smith was a distiller, in a large way of
business, at Whitechapel, and the premises of his brother James, who was
a rectifier, adjoined his. The law forbids the junction of the
businesses of distilling and rectifying, or any communication between
premises carrying on such businesses; and, in this case, it was presumed
that all spirit would be conveyed from one to the other by means of the
highway. But the contention of the prosecution was, that the Excise
officers, finding a great deficiency in the spirits ostensibly produced,
as compared with the “wash,” had detected holes in a large receiver, and
found, moreover, that they could themselves convey spirits from the
distillery to the rectifying house, through pipes under ground, which
were mixed up with those which supplied water, and so escaped detection.
This the defendants denied, and brought forward evidence that the pipes
were obsolete and disused. In the end, the verdict of the jury was, “We
find for the Crown; but we are anxious to express our opinion that there
has not been any evidence adduced before us which shows that the pipe has
been fraudently used by the defendant.” The amount of damages claimed by
the Crown was £150,000; but, by agreement, this was reduced to £76,000;
and, finally, after an appeal from Mr. Smith, the Government were content
with a cheque for £10,000.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account