I would that I could sufficiently emphasise the imperative necessity of early recognition of the true nature of these cases. Colchicum is a most valuable drug, and so is salicylate of soda. But they have their limitations. They act swiftly or not at all. Persistence with them in the absence of any response is worse than futile: it is definitely prejudicial. Because of our unreasoning devotion, our almost fetishistic addiction, to these drugs, I often feel that these agents, especially salicylate of soda, have made more cripples than they have saved. For, unfortunately, unqualified reliance on these drugs is apt to blind us to the surgical necessities of these cases. Foci of infection pass unnoticed, joints stiffen at unfavourable angles, and not infrequently a potential bread-winner is lost. I make no apology for this digression, for it is, strictly speaking, wholly apposite, this in view of the fact that failure of quick response to the action of colchicum or salicylate of soda, say within a week, speaks in favour of the infection having ensued in a _non-gouty_ as opposed to a gouty subject. CHAPTER XXII CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS (_continued_) CHRONIC ARTICULAR GOUT If the diagnosis of acute types of articular gout often presents difficulties, these same are, if anything, accentuated when we approach its chronic manifestations. For, _apart from uratic deposits_, the anatomical lesions that ensue in joints the seat of long-continued gout have no _specific_ character. In short, there is nothing pathognomonic of gout in the changes produced, and which, as a matter of fact, we know to be capable of production, by many different morbid agencies. Surely this lack of specificity in its structural lesions should make us very chary of admitting to the category of chronic articular gout any examples of arthritis _destitute of uratic deposits_. In our chapter on _classification_ we emphasised the desirability of restricting the usage of the term chronic articular gout to that type long since known as _tophaceous_ gout, this because there is little, if any, doubt that that variety known as chronic deforming gout (syn. arthritis deformans uratica) is largely made up of examples of rheumatoid or atrophic arthritis and hypertrophic arthritis or osteoarthritis.[41] As to _osteoarthritis_, I do not for a moment deny that _uratic deposits_ may be met with in its victims. One frequently meets with patients, the subjects of osteoarthritis of the hip, who at the same time exhibit tophi in the ears. But such to our mind are to be regarded as merely instances of _osteoarthritis_ occurring in subjects of “gouty diathesis.” This apparent blending of the two disorders must not be allowed to impair the clarity of our conception as to the essential distinctness of gouty arthritis and osteoarthritis.