Government in Republican ChinaLinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
Government in Republican China
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
China -- Politics and government -- 1912-1949
The common people had crossbows for shooting birds or pronged hoes for
digging which were efficient even in fighting standing armies; they were
also frequently in possession of weapons because they were called up as
militia against barbarians. Underlying such military conditions, with
their highly important political consequences, there were several
surprisingly concrete and simple mechanical considerations. The
charioteers had come to an end partly because the chariots were drawn by
horses yoked in such a fashion that when the horses pulled hard, they
often choked themselves. Other factors are suggested by Dubs:
By the time that horses became plentiful, so that cavalry was
employed, the crossbow had reached such a state of development that
cavalry was shown to be inferior to infantry with crossbows. The
medieval European crossbow was hampered by the mechanical weakness of
its trigger mechanism--the crossbow was likely to be discharged
prematurely by a jar; the Chinese Han crossbow had no such defect and
was a powerful weapon. A group of crossbowmen with others in the rear
to string crossbows and others to bring cocked bows to the marksmen in
the front rank, could shoot down cavalry before they could come near
enough to discharge the lighter bows cavalry necessarily carried.
Cocked crossbows could be carried around safely and fired when needed.
A bolt from a powerful crossbow could pierce any armor. Hence the
strong-backed peasant with a crossbow had an advantage over the noble
no matter how well the noble was armed or how good horses the latter
possessed. The only advantage retained by the noble was that of
leadership--tactical skill and command of large bodies of infantry.
Cavalry became useful for scouting and pursuit chiefly.[8]
The character of military techniques caused Chinese politics to be
qualified by rebellion or the fear of rebellion. The difference between
a mob and an army became slight. In times of poor government there were
rebellions almost yearly. Insurrectionary forces gained momentum
overnight; from era to era huge mobs, tens and hundreds of thousands
strong, swept away governmental armies and erased corrupt or oppressive
dynasties. The process may be described as popular unrest made effective
with arms, which professional armies could not resist. The low place of
the soldier in society prevented men of genius from organizing a
dominant military caste; the professional armies were insufficient to
make military government effective. By a crude and brutal democracy of
mob and murder the populace of China could destroy dynasties and
governments whenever economic, social, or political conditions veered
too far beyond the limits of the tolerable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account