Graham's Magazine, Vol. XL, No. 1, January 1852Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XL, No. 1, January 1852
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
later evangils of democracy as he did of the Daguerreotype and the
electric telegraph. In this way Cade, Richard, and a thousand others are
in the hands of the historians, tricked out as much in the colors of
imagination as in those of fact.
No man can be sure of the lesser details of the annals, though he may
put faith in some of their great facts. We are not indisposed to allow
that there was a man named Julius Cæsar; though whether he ever said,
_Quid times? vehis Cæzarem_, in the boat, or _Et tu Brute!_ when the
republicans set upon him in the senate-house, is not quite so credible.
Most of these picturesque properties of character or fact, so to speak,
are furnished by the fancies and after-thoughts of the narrators, or
fabricated wilfully for a purpose. We need not go very far back in
history to discover the truth of this. In a late memoir (Achille de
Vaulabelle’s) of the “Two Restorations,” we are told that an old story
of the consternation of the members of the Directory, on its violent
dissolution by Bonaparte, in 1800, was a false one. There was no
hurry-skurry, nor jumping out of windows, any more than when Oliver
Cromwell put an end to the Long Parliament. Again, that glorification
made on the sinking of the _Vengeur_, in an engagement with the English
fleet, during the first French revolution, has been latterly put out of
countenance. The story in France was, that, being terribly damaged, this
ship sunk with all on board, her flag flying, and the crew shouting,
“Long live the republic!” Carlyle adopted this version in his history,
and makes quite a cartoon of it, in his own outlandish phraseology. But
on the appearance of the story in an English work, a naval officer who
witnessed the affair of the _Vengeur_, wrote a letter to the Times, in
which he stated that, instead of going down with true republican
devotion, the poor French sailors, small blame to them! jumped
overboard, and tried to save themselves, and that some hundreds of them
were rescued in the British boats. That message, said to have come from
the dying Dessaix to Bonaparte, on the field of Marengo, (“Tell the
First Consul I die regretting I can no farther serve him and France,”)
was fabricated in the bulletin by the aforesaid consul himself. The
story of the Duke of Wellington lying in the hollow square of the Guards
at Waterloo, and, on the advance of the French, crying, “Up, Guards, and
at them!” is as untenable as our own famous saying—“A little more
grape, Captain Bragg!” or the military speeches of the great generals of
antiquity, as recorded by Tacitus, Sallust, Cæsar, and the rest of the
writers. Then, as regards great facts, different nations give different
accounts. Ask who gained Waterloo? “We did,” say the Prussians. “We gave
vast assistance,” say the Belgians. Ask John Bull, or rather, don’t; his
answer would be rather brief than polite. We should like to see a
history of the campaigns in Greece of Darius, Xerxes, and Mardonius,
written by Persians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account