Graham's Magazine, Vol. XVIII, No. 3, March 1841Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XVIII, No. 3, March 1841
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
“The interests of France:” he continued, addressing De Bausset, “and as
my dynasty does violence to my heart, the divorce has become a rigorous
duty. I am more afflicted by what has happened to Josephine, because,
three days ago, she must have learned it from Hortensia. The unhappy
obligation which condemns me to separate myself from her, I deplore with
all my heart, but I thought she possessed more strength of character,
and I was not prepared for these bursts of grief.”
They hurried away. Conscience, ever-faithful conscience, was already
performing its duty; he felt its just upbraidings. He essayed to stifle
it. It was this that led him to utter such language to De Bausset—to
assert that he thought she possessed strength of character enough to
receive the announcement without those bursts of grief. What virtuous
and affectionate woman could receive with calmness a sentence of
repudiation; and that, too, by the tongue of a beloved husband? Her
heart must have become as stone.
On the sixteenth of December, 1809, the law, authorising the divorce,
was enacted by the conservative senate. In the following March the
nuptials between Napoleon and Marie Louise, were performed in Vienna;
and on the first day of April, a little more than four months after the
scene above described, they were joined in wedlock in the city of Paris,
by his uncle, Cardinal Fesch.
Thus was consummated that act which cast a stain upon the character of
“the great Napoleon,” which time cannot efface. A blot, deep and
indelible, that will remain whilst his name lives among men. It was an
act contrary to the laws of God and of humanity.
One wrong action will often tarnish a whole life. We may admire his
bravery, and courage, his vast conception of mind, his gigantic
intellect, his unparalleled energy, his perseverance, and his
determination of character, but when we turn to this dark page in his
history, admiration vanishes, and contempt and disgust usurp its place.
It was indeed an act unworthy of the man, and one that admits of no
palliation. It was not to France the sacrifice, as he termed it, was
made; it was to ambition. And may we not surmise that the lowering
fortunes which ever after were his, and the dark fate which closed his
days in a lonely island, afar off on the bosom of the ocean, were, in
some measure, acts of divine retribution, which this act of his called
forth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account