Graham's Magazine, Vol. XX, No. 1, January 1842Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XX, No. 1, January 1842
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
if, in short, we are to judge of the value of a literary composition in
any degree by its _effect_—then was the “Hoax” most precious.
But Mr. Locke is also a poet of high order. We have seen—nay more—we
have heard him read—verses of his own which would make the fortune of
two-thirds of our poetasters; and he is yet so modest as never to have
published a volume of poems. As an editor—as a political writer—as a
writer in general—we think that he has scarcely a superior in America.
There is no man among us to whose sleeve we would rather pin—not our
_faith_ (of that we say nothing)—but our _judgment_.
His MS. is clear, bold and forcible—somewhat modified, no doubt, by the
circumstances of his editorial position—but still sufficiently
indicative of his fine intellect.
[Illustration: signature of RW Emerson.]
Mr. Ralph Waldo Emerson belongs to a class of gentlemen with whom we
have no patience whatever—the mystics for mysticism’s sake. Quintilian
mentions a pedant who taught obscurity, and who once said to a pupil
“this is excellent, for I do not understand it myself.” How the good man
would have chuckled over Mr. E! His present _rôle_ seems to be the
out-Carlyling Carlyle. _Lycophron Tenebrosus_ is a fool to him. The best
answer to his twaddle is _cui bono?_—a very little Latin phrase very
generally mistranslated and misunderstood—_cui bono?_—to whom is it a
benefit? If not to Mr. Emerson individually, then surely to no man
living.
His love of the obscure does not prevent him, nevertheless, from the
composition of occasional poems in which beauty is apparent _by
flashes_. Several of his effusions appeared in the “Western
Messenger”—more in the “Dial,” of which he is the soul—or the sun—or
the shadow. We remember the “Sphynx,” the “Problem,” the “Snow Storm,”
and some fine old-fashioned verses entitled “Oh fair and stately maid
whose eye.”
His MS. is bad, sprawling, illegible and irregular—although
sufficiently bold. This latter trait may be, and no doubt is, only a
portion of his general affectation.
[Illustration: signature of G C Verplanck]
The name of Gulian C. Verplanck has long been familiar to all American
readers, and it is scarcely necessary to say more than that we coincide
in the general view of his merits. His orations, reviews, and other
compositions all evince the cultivated belles-lettres scholar, and man
of intellect and taste. To high genius he has about the same claim as
Mr. Sprague, whom in many respects he closely resembles.
His chirography is unusually rambling and school-boyish—but has vigor
and precision. It has no doubt been greatly modified by adventitious
circumstances, so that it would be impossible to predicate anything
respecting it.
* * * * *
“DORCHESTER.”
BY W. GILMORE SIMMS, AUTHOR OF “ATALANTIS,” “THE YEMASSEE,” ETC.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account