Graham's Magazine, Vol. XX, No. 3, March 1842Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XX, No. 3, March 1842
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
That Lord Brougham _was_ an extraordinary man no one in his senses will
deny. An intellect of unusual capacity, goaded into diseased action by
passions nearly ferocious, enabled him to astonish the world, and
especially the “hero-worshippers,” as the author of Sartor-Resartus has
it, by the combined extent and variety of his mental triumphs.
Attempting many things, it may at least be said that he egregiously
failed in none. But that he pre-eminently excelled in any cannot be
affirmed with truth, and might well be denied _à priori_. We have no
faith in admirable Crichtons, and this merely because we have implicit
faith in Nature and her laws. “He that is born to be a man,” says
Wieland, in his ‘Peregrinus Proteus,’ “neither should nor can be
anything nobler, greater, nor better than a man.” The Broughams of the
human intellect are never its Newtons or its Bayles. Yet the
contemporaneous reputation to be acquired by the former is naturally
greater than any which the latter may attain. The versatility of one
whom we see and hear is a more dazzling and more readily appreciable
merit than his profundity; which latter is best estimated in the silence
of the closet, and after the quiet lapse of years. What impression Lord
Brougham has stamped upon his age, cannot be accurately determined until
Time has fixed and rendered definite the lines of the medal; and fifty
years hence it will be difficult, perhaps, even to make out the deepest
indentations of the _exergue_. Like Coleridge he should be regarded as
one who might have done much, had he been satisfied with attempting but
little.
The title of the book before us is, we think, somewhat disingenuous.
These two volumes contain but a small portion of the “Critical and
Miscellaneous Writings” of Lord Brougham; and the preface itself assures
us that what is here published _forms only a part of his anonymous
contributions to the Edinburgh Review_. In fact three similar selections
from his “Miscellaneous Works” have been given to the world within a
year or two past, by Philadelphian publishers, and neither of these
selections embrace any of the matter now issued.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account