Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXX, No. 4, April 1847Various
History
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXX, No. 4, April 1847
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
Truly, our greatest blessings are very cheap. To have our sunlight
without paying for it, without any duty levied,—to have our poet there
in England, to furnish us entertainment, and what is better provocation,
from year to year, all our lives long, to make the world seem richer for
us, the age more respectable, and life better worth the living,—all
without expense of acknowledgment even, but silently accepted out of the
east, like morning light as a matter of course.
* * * * *
APRIL.
Now fitful clouds scud o’er the skies,
And fairy showers patter by,
And in the wood the low wind sighs,
And shadows o’er the brown fields fly!
Low fades the sun, then blazes out,
Glinting on grass, and twig, and tree—
Ah! April, boyish out and out,
Now tears, and now all jollity!
* * * * *
MR. KERR MUDGEON.
OR “YOU WONT, WONT YOU?”
BY JOSEPH C. NEAL.
[Illustration]
There; now!
You see—do you not?—Nay, you may almost hear it, if you listen
attentively. Mr. Kerr Mudgeon—great many of the Kerr Mudgeons about, in
various places—but this Mr. Kerr Mudgeon—going to a party as he
was—desirous too, as people generally are on such occasions, of looking
particularly well—and all ready, to his own infinite satisfaction—all
ready except the final operation of putting on his bettermost coat—has
torn that important article of gentlemanly costume—one may work without
a coat, you know, and work all the easier for the relief; but it is not
altogether polite to leave it at home on a peg when you go to a party.
Torn his coat—not through his own fault, as Mr. Kerr Mudgeon would tell
you explicitly enough—he never is, never was, never can be in
fault—but because of that coat’s ill timed and provoking resistance to
the operation of being donned. The coat might have known—who is ever
thus to be trifled with in the process of dressing? Yes, the coat must
have known. Ah, coats and the makers of coats have much to answer for.
Kerr Mudgeon is ruffled, ruffles of this sort, causing a man to look
none the handsomer or the more amiable for the ruffle. Such ruffles are
not becoming.
“Ho! ho! wont go on, hey?” cried Mr. Kerr Mudgeon, and Mr. Kerr Mudgeon
panted and Mr. Kerr Mudgeon blew, on the high pressure principle, until
the steam of his wrath had reached its highest point.
It is a fearful moment with the Kerr Mudgeons, when it is manifest that
something must break—a blood vessel or the furniture, or the peace of
the commonwealth. Why will things animate and inanimate conspire to
bring about such a crisis? Kerr Mudgeons would be sweet tempered if you
would only permit them.
The coat positively refused to go on any further—the contumacious
raiment. What could Kerr Mudgeon do in such a strait of perverse broad
cloth?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account