Graham's Magazine Vol XXXIII No. 3 September 1848Various
General
Graham's Magazine Vol XXXIII No. 3 September 1848
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
This is Bulwer's most successful attempt at writing an historical
novel, but with all its merits, it is still rather an attempt than a
performance. Considered as a history of the Norman invasion, it
contains many more facts than can be found in Thierry, at least in
that portion of his work devoted to Harold and William. Bulwer seems
to have obtained his knowledge at the original sources, and the novel
is certainly creditable to his scholarship. But he has not managed
his materials in an imaginative way, and fact and fiction are tied
rather than fused together. The consequence is that the work is not
homogeneous. At times it appears like history, but after the mind of
the reader has settled down to a historical mood, the impression is
broken by a violent intrusion of fable, or an introduction of modern
sentiment and thought. It has therefore neither the interest of
Thierry's exquisite narrative of the same events, nor the interest
which might have been derived from a complete amalgamation of the
materials into a consistent work of imagination. Considered also as a
reproduction of ancient men and manners it is strikingly defective.
With many fine strokes of the pencil, where the author confines
himself to the literal fact, his portraits, as a whole, are
overcharged with _Bulwerism_. His imagination is not a mirror. It can
reflect nothing without vitiating it. He does not possess the power of
passing a character through his mind and preserving its individuality.
It goes in as Harold, or Duke William, or Lafranc, but it comes out as
Sir E. Bulwer Lytton, Bart.
The novel contains much of that seductive sentiment, half romantic,
half misanthropic, which is the characteristic of Bulwer's works, and
it is expressed with his usual beauty and brilliancy of style. Here
and there we perceive allusions to his own domestic affairs, which
none but Lady Bulwer can fully appreciate. Every reader of the novel
must be struck with its attempt at the moral tone. Edith, the heroine,
is the bride of Harold's soul, and Platonism appears in all its
splendor of self-denial and noble sentiments in a Saxon thane and his
maiden. History pronounces this lady to be his mistress, and it
certainly is a great stretch of the reader's charity to be compelled
to view her in the capacity of saint. Not only, however, in the loves
of Harold and Edith, but all over the novel, there is a constant
intrusion of ethical reflections, which will doubtless much edify all
young ladies of a tender age. These would be well enough if they
appeared to have any base in solid moral principle, but they are
somewhat offensive as the mere sentimentality of conscience and
religion, introduced for the purposes of fine writing. Suspicion,
also, always attaches to the morality which exhibits itself on
rhetorical stilts, and the refinement which is always proclaiming
itself refined. Since the time of Joseph Surface there has been a
great decline in the market price of noble sentiments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account