Graham's Magazine Vol XXXIII No. 5 November 1848Various
General
Graham's Magazine Vol XXXIII No. 5 November 1848
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
There is one curious letter to Reynolds, referring to Wordsworth's
calling the exquisite Hymn to Pan, in "Endymion," "a pretty piece of
Paganism." Keats took the words in a contemptuous sense, and wrote a
letter from the feelings it excited, reminding us in its style of an
essay by Emerson. We extract it as almost the best thing in the book.
_Hampstead, February 3, 1818._
MY DEAR REYNOLDS,--I thank you for your dish of
filberts. Would I could get a basket of them by way of
dessert every day for the sum of two pence, (two
sonnets on Robin Hood, sent by the two penny post.)
Would we were a sort of athereal pigs, and turned loose
to feed upon spiritual mast and acorns! which would be
merely a squirrel and feeding upon filberts; for what
is a squirrel but an airy pig, or a filbert but a sort
of archangelical acorn? About the nuts being worth
cracking, all I can say is, that where there are a
throng of delightful images ready drawn, simplicity is
the only thing. It may be said that we ought to read
our contemporaries, that Wordsworth, &c., should have
their due from us. But, for the sake of a few fine
imaginative or domestic passages, are we to be bullied
into a certain philosophy engendered in the whims of an
egotist? Every man has his speculations, but every man
does not brood and peacock over them till he makes a
false coinage and deceives himself. Many a man can
travel to the very bourne of Heaven, and yet want
confidence to put down his half-seeing. Sancho will
invent a journey heavenward as well as any body. We
hate poetry that has a palpable design upon us, and, if
we do not agree, seems to put its hand into its
breeches pocket. Poetry should be great and
unobtrusive; a thing which enters into one's soul, and
does not startle it or amaze it with itself, but with
its subject. How beautiful are the retired flowers! How
would they lose their beauty, were they to throng into
the highway, crying out "Admire me, I am a violet! Dote
upon me, I am a primrose!" Modern poets differ from the
Elizabethans in this; each of the moderns, like an
Elector of Hanover, governs his petty state, and knows
how many straws are swept daily from the causeways in
all his dominions, and has a continual itching that all
the housewives should have their coppers well scoured.
The ancients were emperors of vast provinces; they had
only heard of the remote ones, and scarcely cared to
visit them. I will cut all this. I will have no more of
Wordsworth or Hunt in particular. Why should we be of
the tribe of Manassah, when we can wander with Esau?
Why should we kick against the pricks when we can walk
on roses? Why should we be owls when we can be eagles?
Why be teazed with "nice-eyed wagtails," when we have
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account