Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXXV, No. 2, August 1849Various
General
Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXXV, No. 2, August 1849
Various
Literature -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals
Investigation has shown that the Condor is merely a large, perhaps not
the largest of the vultures. “The Condor,” writes Mr. Bennett, “forms
the type of a genus, a second species of which is the _Vultur papa_ of
Linnæus, the king of the vultures of British writers. They are both
peculiar to the New World, but approach in their most essential
characters very closely to the vultures of the Old Continent, differing
from the latter principally in the large, fleshy, or rather
cartilaginous, caruncle which surmounts their beaks, in the large size
of their oval and longitudinal nostrils, placed almost at the very
extremity of the cere; and in the comparative length of their quill
feathers, the third being the longest of the series. The most important
of these differences, the size and position of their nostrils, appears
to be well calculated to add to the already highly powerful sense of
smell possessed by the typical vulture, and for which the birds have
been almost proverbially celebrated from the earliest ages. There is
also a third species, the Californian vulture, two noble specimens of
which, the only pair in Europe, are preserved in the London Zoological
Society’s Museum, rivaling the Condor in bulk, and agreeing in every
respect with the generic characters of the group, except in the
existence of the caruncle, of which they are entirely destitute.
“In size the Condor is little, if at all, superior to the Bearded
Griffin, the Lämmergeyer of the Alps, with which Buffon was disposed
conjecturally to confound it, but to which it bears at most but a
distant relation. The greatest authentic measurement scarcely carries
the extent of its wings beyond fourteen feet, and it appears rarely to
attain so gigantic a size. M. Humboldt met with none that exceeded nine
feet, and was assured by many credible inhabitants of the province of
Quito that they had never shot any that measured more than eleven. The
length of a male specimen somewhat less than nine feet in expanse was
three feet three inches from the tip of the beak to the extremity of the
tail; and its height, when perching with the neck partly withdrawn, two
feet eight inches. Its beak was two inches and three quarters in length,
and an inch and a quarter in depth when closed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account