[30] For a lengthened description and classification of the various forms of stone implements, the reader is referred to a new work, “The Ancient Stone Implements of Great Britain,” by that able antiquary, Mr. John Evans, the author of the admirable volume on “Ancient British Coins,” by which his name is so well known. [31] For a memoir, with portrait, of this remarkable character, and an account of his doings, see the _Reliquary_, vol, viii., p. 65, _et seq._ [32] “Ten Years’ Diggings.” [33] _Reliquary_ for October, 1861. [34] “Nec habet quem porrigat ore trientem.”--JUVENAL. [35] The skull of one of these, an excellent typical example of a Roman in the very prime of life, is engraved in “Crania Britannica,” pl. 30. [36] See example in the York museum. [37] “Collectanea Antiqua,” vol. iii., p. 45. [38] “Proceedings of the Yorkshire Philosophical Society;” Wellbeloved’s “Eburacum;” “Crania Britannica,” etc. [39] Now in the Bateman Museum. [40] See the _Reliquary_, vol. iv., p. 185. [41] In the _Intellectual Observer_. [42] See Mr. Roach Smith’s interesting account of this vase in the “Collectanea Antiqua,” vol. iv., pp. 82-89. [43] Wright. [44] Thomas Wright. [45] Wright. [46] For an interesting account of these potteries, see Wise’s “New Forest.” [47] For a detailed account of all the different pot-works and their productions, see my “Ceramic Art in England.” [48] C. R. Smith. [49] Shields. [50] Armour. [51] A detailed account of this discovery will be found, from the pens of Mr. Briggs, the Editor, and others, in the “Reliquary,” vol. ix. [52] Coat of mail. [53] C. R. Smith. [54] See the “Reliquary Quarterly Archæological Journal and Review,” vol. ix. p. 180. [55] “Ten Years’ Diggings,” p. 28. [56] “Vestiges,” p. 24. [57] For a more extended and fully illustrated account of penannular brooches, the reader is referred to the “Reliquary,” vol. iii. [58] “Ten Years’ Diggings,” p. 231. * * * * * * Transcriber's note: Inconsistent spelling and hyphenation are as in the original. One instance of unpaired double quotation marks in the original was not corrrected.