Band directors -- United States; Bands (Music) -- United States
Another great aid to the high school bands was a national band contest
sponsored by music manufacturers who gave the winners generous money
prizes. The first venture in 1923 was a huge success and started the
contest idea off with a bang. This was the beginning of a most profound
movement which worked a decided change in the whole status of bands in
the United States, and from which an entirely new school music program
grew.
A number of school boards woke up to the cultural and educational value
of the new band development among the youth. They made it a regular
part of the curriculum, and school credits were given the course.
National band contests were sponsored by various industries, service
clubs, and often by state fairs. Beginning in 1925 contests were held
annually in various cities. The heads of the Service Bands and tops in
concert bands and other noted musical organizations gladly cooperated
in this great musical movement by acting as judges and band leaders.
The meet held at Flint, Michigan in 1930 was highly spectacular. John
Philip Sousa led forty-two large bands in a mammoth concert before an
audience of 75,000.
Although school bands originated in the Midwest states, they soon
sprang up like mushrooms over the entire nation. In some states as
many as 600 to 700 bands entered state-wide competition. The idea
grew too large for the plan, and in 1937 the country was divided into
ten regions. Contests were held in each state, then these winners
competed in the regional meets, and the victors joined in the national
competitions.
The name “Competition Festival” replaced the title “Contests.” Instead
of selecting a first, second and third winner in each group of
contestants and giving them prizes, the rating plan is now used--five
ratings for the best performances in each class of musicians entered.
The students are not competing against any one person but are trying to
equal or approach a perfect standard (or example) of performance. The
ratings are listed as follows:
1. _Best_ conceivable performance of the class which is being judged.
2. _Unusually_ fine performance.
3. _Good_ performance.
4. _Average_ performance.
5. A performance showing much room for improvement.
The leading authorities in the field of music education have come to
believe that “the principal purpose of competition _in_ music is to
advance the cause of education _through_ music.” They feel that this
activity contributes great value in building character through the
experience, team work, good fellowship and the ability to be good
losers as well as proud winners.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account