Great leaders: Historic portraits from the great historians
History
Great leaders: Historic portraits from the great historians
Biography
He had greatly distinguished himself in opposition, and had thus drawn
on himself the royal displeasure, which was, indeed, so strong that he
was not admitted into the Council of Thirty without much difficulty and
long altercation. As soon, however, as he had obtained a footing at
court, the charms of his manner and of his conversation made him a
favorite. He was seriously alarmed by the violence of the public
discontent. He thought that liberty was for the present safe, and that
order and legitimate authority were in danger. He therefore, as was his
fashion, joined himself to the weaker side. Perhaps his conversion was
not wholly disinterested. For study and reflection, though they had
emancipated him from many vulgar prejudices, had left him a slave to
vulgar desires. Money he did not want; and there is no evidence that he
ever obtained it by any means which, in that age, even severe censors
considered as dishonorable; but rank and power had strong attractions
for him. He pretended, indeed, that he considered titles and great
offices as baits which could allure none but fools, that he hated
business, pomp, and pageantry, and that his dearest wish was to escape
from the bustle and glitter of Whitehall to the quiet woods which
surrounded his ancient mansion in Nottinghamshire; but his conduct was
not a little at variance with his professions. In truth he wished to
command the respect at once of courtiers and of philosophers, to be
admired for attaining high dignities, and to be at the same time admired
for despising them.
More than one historian has been charged with partiality to Halifax. The
truth is that the memory of Halifax is entitled in an especial manner to
the protection of history. For what distinguishes him from all other
English statesmen is this, that through a long public life, and through
frequent and violent revolutions of public feeling, he almost invariably
took that view of the great questions of his time which history has
finally adopted. He was called inconstant, because the relative position
in which he stood to the contending factions was perpetually varying. As
well might the pole star be called inconstant because it is sometimes to
the east and sometimes to the west of the pointers. To have defended the
ancient and legal constitution of the realm against a seditious populace
at one conjuncture, and against a tyrannical government at another; to
have been the foremost champion of order in the turbulent Parliament of
1680, and the foremost champion of liberty in the servile Parliament of
1685; to have been just and merciful to Roman Catholics in the days of
the Popish Plot, and to Exclusionists in the days of the Rye House Plot;
to have done all in his power to save both the head of Strafford and the
head of Russell; this was a course which contemporaries, heated by
passion, and deluded by names and badges, might not unnaturally call
fickle, but which deserves a very different name from the late justice
of posterity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account