As against them, we must take into account certain salient
differences. The lot of the departed in the Babylonian epic account
appears drearier even than {206} in the Homeric, just as the
Babylonian religious poetry inclines to the more sombre tones and the
more violent pathos. The dead inhabit “the house wherein he who enters
is excluded from the light, the place where dust is their bread, and
mud their food. They behold not the light, they dwell in darkness, and
are clothed, like birds, in a garment of feathers; and over door and
bolt the dust is scattered.”[206.1] This is more hopeless than the
Homeric meadow of Asphodel, where the souls still pursue the shadow of
their former interests, and some tidings of the earth may penetrate to
give them joy. Also, the demoniac terrors of the lower world are more
vividly presented in Babylonian than in Hellenic literature and art.
The demons of disease that perform the bidding of Allatu, the Queen of
Hell, are closely connected with the ghost-world; we learn from the
formulae of exorcism that the haunting demon that destroyed a man’s
vital energies might be a wandering spectre. “O Shamash, a horrible
spectre for many days hath fastened itself on my back, and will not
loose its hold upon me.… he sendeth forth pollution, he maketh the
hair of my head to stand up, he taketh the power from my body, he
maketh my eyes to start out, he plagueth my back, he poisoneth my
flesh, he plagueth my whole body… whether it be the spectre of my own
family and kindred, or the spectre of one who was murdered, or whether
it be the spectre of any other man that haunteth me.”[206.2]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account