servant of Ningirsu.”[219.5] These isolated utterances, if they had
penetrated the popular religious thought, might have engendered a
softer and brighter sentiment concerning the world of death. But it is
doubtful if they were potent enough to effect this.[219.6] If the
gentle Tammuz had displaced Allatu and Nergal as the Lord of death,
Babylonian eschatology might have had a different career. But it does
not appear that he ever did. Deeply beloved as he was, he never
reached the position of a high god either in heaven or the lower
world.[219.7] Nor did his resurrection from the {220} dead evoke any
faith, as far as we see at present, that might comfort the individual
concerning his own lot. The personality and the rites of Attis, “the
Phrygian shepherd,” are closely akin to those of Tammuz, and may be
partly of Babylonian origin: and from these were evolved a higher
eschatologic theory that became a powerful religious force in later
Paganism. On the other hand, in Babylonia the germs of higher religion
in the Tammuz-ritual seem to have remained unquickened; possibly
because they were not fostered and developed by any mystic society.
For it is perhaps the most salient and significant difference between
Hellenic and Mesopotamian religions that in the latter we have no
trace of mysteries at all, while in the former not only were they a
most potent force in the popular religion, but were the chief agents
for developing the eschatologic faith.
This exposition of the Eastern and Western ideas concerning death and
the ritual of the dead is merely a slight sketch of a great subject;
but may serve the present purpose, the testing the question of early
religious contact. We have noted much general resemblance, but only
such as is found among various races of the world: on the other hand,
certain striking differences, both in detail and general conception,
that argue strongly against the theory of contact or borrowing in the
second millennium. Nor can we discover in the earliest Greek mythology
a single Mesopotamian name or myth associated with the lower
world.[220.1]
CHAPTER XIII.
Babylonian, Anatolian, and Aegean Ritual.
{221}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account