As a religious practice it is a special characteristic of Phrygia, a
land always fascinating to the student on account of its strange
freaks of religious psychology; and from Phrygia the practice spread
into some adjacent communities, such as Bambyke. One may be allowed
{257} to pause a little to consider the original motive that prompted
it. At first sight one is tempted to explain it as due to a morbid
exaggeration of the craving for purity. But elsewhere, where this
impulse was most powerful, for instance, in the later Orphic and Isis
cults, and in early and mediaeval Christianity, it produced many
mental aberrations but not this particular one. Nor, again, have we
any reason for supposing this craving to have been strong in the
devotees of Phrygia; the Galloi of Bambyke, according to Lucian, were
possessed by strong though impotent sexual desires and were allowed
full license with women. The form of communion most ardently sought
with the Phrygian goddess and with the later Sabazios was a marriage
symbolised by a sexual act; and Greek and Latin writers, both pagan
and Christian, agree in reprobating the obscenities of Kybele-Attis
worship; we may note also that Phrygian sacred mythology is somewhat
grosser than the Hellenic.
We are compelled to seek another explanation, and I can suggest none
other than that which I have hazarded elsewhere; namely, that Phrygian
religious emasculation was an act performed in a frenzy of exaltation
by the priest or _mystes_ desirous of assimilating himself as far as
possible to the female nature of the great divinity.[257.1] {258} The
worship was under male ministration for the highest part; but for the
full exercise of divine power the male priest must become quasi-female
and wear a female dress, the latter part of the rôle being common
enough in primitive “theurgy.” The priest is himself at times the
incarnation of the young god, and is called Attis. Therefore Attis was
himself supposed to have performed the same act, even at the cost of
his life. How early was this institution of a eunuch priesthood in
Phrygia we have no direct evidence to prove. It may be a “Hittite”
tradition; for figures that Perrot reasonably interprets as
eunuch-priests are seen on the reliefs of Boghaz-Keui.
Returning to the topic of the death of the divinity, we may assume
that in Phrygia this was a very ancient tradition, enacted yearly by a
ceremonious laying out of the vegetation puppet on a bier, or the
suspension of it on a pine-tree. We have no direct or otherwise trusty
evidence for the immolation of the priest who incarnates the god;
doubtless the stories about the death of Marsyas and the
harvest-sacrifice of Lityerses point to a ritual of human-sacrifice;
whom Marsyas stands for is doubtful, but in the Lityerses legend it is
merely the passing stranger who is slain, and neither of these
traditions is explicitly linked with Attis-cult.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account