In any case, it may be said, the question of borrowing does not arise
within the narrow limits of our inquiry, which is limited to the
pre-Homeric period, since all Greek “katharsis” is post-Homeric. The
latter dictum is obviously not literally true, as a glance through the
Homeric poems will prove. Homer is aware of the necessity of
purification by water before making prayer or libation to the gods:
Achilles washes his hands and the cups before he pours forth wine and
prays to Zeus,[289.1] Telemachos washes his hands in sea-water before
he prays to Athena[289.2]; and there is a significant account of the
purification of the whole Achaean host after the plague;[289.3] as
the later Greeks would have done, the Achaeans throw away into the sea
their λύματα, the infected implements of purification, wool or
whatever they used, that absorbed the evil from them. But it has been
generally observed that Homer does not appear to have been aware of
any need for purification from the stain of bloodshed or from the
ghostly contagion of death. It is true that Odysseus purifies his hall
with fire and sulphur after slaying the suitors, but we are not sure
that the act had any further significance than {290} the riddance of
the smell of blood from the house. Sulphur is there called κακῶν
ἄκος,[290.1] “a remedy against evil things”; but we cannot attach any
moral or spiritual sense to κακὰ, nor is Homeric κάθαρσις related, as
far as we can see, to any animistic belief. There is one passage where
Homer’s silence is valuable and gives positive evidence; Theoklumenos,
who has slain a man of his own tribe and fled from his home, in
consequence approaches Telemachos when the latter is sacrificing and
implores and receives his protection: there is no hint of any feeling
that there is a stain upon him, or that he needs purification, or that
his presence pollutes the sacrifice.[290.2] All this would have been
felt by the later Greek; and in the post-Homeric period we have to
reckon with a momentous growth of the idea of impurity and of a
complex system of purification, especially in regard to homicide,
leading to important developments in the sphere of law and morality
which I have tried to trace out on other occasions.[290.3] But Homer
may well be regarded as the spokesman of a gifted race, the Achaeans,
as we call them, on whom the burden of the doctrine of purification
lay lightly, and for whom the ghostly world had comparatively little
terror or interest. Besides the Achaeans, however, and their kindred
races there was the submerged population of the older culture who
enter into the composition of the various Hellenes of history.
Therefore the varied development in the post-Homeric period of
cathartic ideas may be only a renaissance, a recrudescence of forces
that were active enough in the second millennium. {291} Attica may
have been the home where the old tradition survived, and cathartic
rites such as the Thargelia and the trial of the axe for murder in the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account