Confining ourselves generally to the second millennium B.C., we have
surveyed the religions of the adjacent peoples between the valley of
the Euphrates and the western shores of the Aegean; and have observed
that morphologically they are generally on the same plane of
polytheism, but that those of Mesopotamia and Hellas reveal inner
differences, striking and vital enough to be serious stumbling-blocks
to a theory of affiliation. These differences concern the {305}
personality of the divinities and their relations to the various parts
of the world of nature; the most salient being the different attitude
of the two peoples to the divine luminaries of heaven and to the
chthonian powers of the lower world. They concern the cosmogonies of
East and West, their views of the creation of the world, and the
origin of man; on these matters, certain myths which are easily
diffused do not appear to have reached Hellas in this early period.
They concern the religious temperaments of the Babylonian and Hellene,
which appear as separate as the opposite points of the pole; the
rapturous fanatic and self-abasing spirit of the East contrasting
vividly with the coolness, civic sobriety, and self-confidence of the
West. They concern the eschatologic ideas of the two peoples: the cult
of the dead and some idea of a posthumous judgment being found in
early Hellas, while the former was rare, and the latter is scarcely
discoverable, in Mesopotamia. They concern, finally, the ritual; and
here the salient points of contrast are the different views of the
sacrifice, of the sacrificial victim, and the sacrificial blood; the
different methods of purification and the expulsion of sin; the ritual
of sorrow associated with the death of the god, so powerful in
Babylonia and so insignificant (by comparison) in Hellas; the
un-Hellenic Mylitta-rite, and the service of the “hierodoulai”; and,
to conclude with the most vital difference of all, the manifestations
of magic and its relation to the national religions, so complex, so
pregnant for thought and faith, and so dominant in Mesopotamia; on the
other hand, so insignificant and unobtrusive in Hellas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account