The Aramaic inscriptions only reveal the goddess Ishtar by the side of
many powerful gods such as Ramman, Adad the god of storms, Shamash the
sun-god, Reshef the god of lightning and war, Baal-charran the Lord of
Harran.[85.4] An eighth-century Aramaic inscription found at Sinjerli
in North Syria, written in the reign of Tiglath-Pileser III., mentions
no goddess, but regards the kings as under the protection of Hadad,
Elreshef, and Shamash.[85.5] Even in Canaan and Phoenicia we have no
reason to say that Astarte rose above Baal; such an epithet as “the
Face of Baal” appears to maintain the supremacy of the God. In Moab we
have {86} the evidence of the Mesha stone, which mentions the divine
pair Ashtor-Chemosh, and in Numbers[86.1] the Moabites are called the
people of Chemosh. But we have Phoenician inscriptions of the period
of Persian supremacy in which the king of Byblos, Jachumelek, speaks
of himself as raised to the kingdom by the Baalat, the queen-goddess
of that state; and he prays to her that the queen may give him favour
in the eyes of the gods and in the eyes of the people of his
land.[86.2] Astarte was _par excellence_ the city-goddess of Sidon,
and on the later Imperial coinage we see her image drawn in a car. Two
representations of her have been found, in one of which she is seated
in front of the king,[86.3] the other shows her embracing him.[86.4]
King Tabnit of Sidon, whose sarcophagus is in the Museum of
Constantinople, styles himself “priest of Astarte, King of the
Sidonians.”[86.5] But in the other Phoenician settlements, such as
Tyre, Cyprus, and Carthage, the memorials of the male divinity,
whether Baal, Baal Samin, Baal Ammon, Reshef Mikal, Esmun-Melqart, are
at least as conspicuous. It is likely that at certain places in the
Mediterranean the Semites were touched by the influences of the
aboriginal Aegean goddess’s cult; this may well have been the case at
Sidon, and still more probably at Askalon, and it may have penetrated
as far as Bambyke.
Speaking generally, however, we may conclude that among the early
Semites the male divinity was dominant. And if we could believe that
this is a reflection in their theology of the patriarchal system in
society, let us observe that the earliest Babylonian {87} evidence
proves that the patriarchal type of family was dominant in Babylonia
in the third millennium.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account