The question we have just been considering, the physical character of
the Babylonian deities in relation to their whole personality,
suggests two last reflections. Their gods have a certain relation to
the planets, which is preserved even in our modern astronomy. That the
early Sumerians worshipped stars is probable,[102.4] as the Sumerian
sign for divinity is a star; but that the Sumerian-Babylonian high
gods were personal forms of the planets, is denied by leading modern
Assyriologists,[103.1] {103} except in the case of the sun and the
moon, Shamash and Sin. It was only the Chaldaean astronomic theory
that came to regard the various planets in their varying positions as
special manifestations of the powers of the different personal gods;
and the same planet might be a manifestation, according to its
different positions, of different gods: the “star Jupiter at one point
is Marduk, at another point Nebo”; this dogma is found on a
seventh-century tablet, which declares at the same time that “Mercury”
is Nebo.[103.2] This planetary association of the deities is well
illustrated by the memorial relief of Asarhaddon found at Sinjerli,
and the relief of Maltaija, showing stars crowning their
heads;[103.3] but both these are later than the period with which we
are here immediately concerned.
Lastly, we fail to observe in that domain of the old Babylonian
religion which may be called nature-worship, any clear worship of the
earth regarded as a personal and living being, as the Hellenes
regarded Gaia. The great goddesses, Ishtar, the goddess at once
warlike and luxurious, virgin and yet unchaste, terrible and merciful,
the bright virgin of the sky, Bau, the wife of Ninib, the “amorous
lady of heaven,” are certainly not of this character. Still less is
Allatu, the monstrous and grim Queen of Hell, at whose breast the
lions are suckled. It seems that if the early Sumerians conceived the
earth as a personal divinity at all, they imagined it as a male
divinity. For in the inscriptions of Nippur, Enlil or Bel appears as a
Lord of the underworld, {104} meaning our earth as distinct from the
heavens: he is hymned as the “lord of the harvest-lands, lord of the
grain-fields”[104.1]--he is the “husbandman who tends the fields”;
when Enlil is angry, “he sends hunger everywhere.” In another hymn he
is thus described: “The great Earth-Mountain is Enlil, the
mountain-storm is he, whose shoulders rival the heavens, whose
foundation is the bright abyss”;[104.2] and again, “Lord, who makest
to abound pure oil and nourishing milk;… in the earth Lord of life art
thou”; “to give life to the ground thou dost exist.”[104.3] It is
evident that Enlil is more than the personal earth regarded as a solid
substance; he is rather the god of all the forces and life that move
on and in the earth, hence he is “the lord of winds.”[104.4] He is
more, then, than the mere equivalent of Gaia. One might have expected
to find a Sumerian counterpart for this goddess in Ninlil or Belit,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account