Here, then, is another point at which the theory of early Babylonian
influence in nascent Hellenic religion seriously breaks down. And in
this comparison of Nature-cults it breaks down markedly at two others.
The pantheon of Mesopotamia had early taken on an astral-character.
The primitive Hellenes doubtless had, like other peoples, their
star-myths; and their {113} superstitions were aroused and
superstitious practices evoked by celestial “teratology,” by striking
phenomena, such as eclipses, comets, falling stars.[113.1] But there
is no record suggesting that they paid direct worship to the stars, or
that their deities were astral personations, or were in the early
period associated with the stars: such association, where it arose, is
merely a sign of that wave of Oriental influence that moved westward
in the later centuries. The only clear evidences of star-cult in
Hellenic communities that I have been able to find do not disturb this
induction: Lykophron and a late Byzantine author indicate a cult of
Zeus Ἀστέριος in Crete, which cannot, even if real, be interpreted as
direct star-worship:[113.2] at Sinope, a city of Assyrian origin,
named after the Babylonian moon-god, a stone with a late inscription
suggests a cult of Seirios and the constellations;[113.3] and an
Attic inscription of the Roman Imperial epoch, mentions a priest of
the φωσφόροι, whom we must interpret as stellar beings.[113.4] What,
then, must we say about the Dioskouroi, whom we are generally taught
to regard as the personal forms of the morning- and the evening-star?
Certainly, if the astral character of the great Twin-Brethren of the
Hellenes were provedly their original one, the general statement just
put forth would have to be seriously modified. But a careful study of
their cult does not justify the conventional view; and the theory that
Wide has insisted on[113.5] appears to me the only reasonable account
{114} of them, namely, that originally they were heroic “chthonian”
figures, to whom a celestial character came later to be attached: it
is significant that the astral aspect of them is only presented in
comparatively late documents and monuments, not in Homer or the
Homeric hymn, and that their most ancient ritual includes a
“lectisternium,” which properly belonged to heroes and personages of
the lower world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account