The evil personal agencies
that remained active were demons, and these {144} were not worshipped,
but exorcised or averted by the good gods.[144.1]
And this may serve as a fairly accurate description of the moral
character of Greek religion at that stage of development where Homer
presents it to us. The high deities are worshipped on the whole as
moral beings and as beneficent: that is, as the guardians of the
social morality of the period, whatever that was. The usual popular
writer does not perceive this, because he is always liable to the
error of confusing mythology with worship, and supposing that if the
mythology is licentious or immoral, the deity is worshipped in that
character. All students of mythology and religion are aware that this
is false. We might be able to show that the religious imagination and
statement of Homer at times fall below the level of contemporary cult,
at times rise above it. At any rate, he is evidently addressing a
world of religious-minded people, who impute their own moral ideals to
their highest divinities, especially to their high god Zeus. Νέμεσις,
the social feeling of indignation which is at the psychic basis of
social morality, is the common emotion excited both in gods and men by
the same acts; and though much of Greek religion was still not yet
penetrated with morality, the higher personal gods were generally
regarded as on the side of righteousness. One or two Greek myths, such
as that of Prometheus, as Hesiod narrates it, might suggest that the
deity was not necessarily conceived as the friend, but sometimes even
as the enemy, of man. But Hesiod’s narrative does not strike us as
primitive or {145} popular; and, at any rate, such a view is
inconsistent with the earliest stage of worship that we can discover
or surmise. The poets and philosophers might dislike Ares; but the
Hellenes, who worshipped him, did not worship him as an evil god, with
apotropaeic rites: nor is it proved or likely that any deity to whom
actual service was paid, was regarded as in his nature maleficent by
his worshippers. The dread powers of the lower world were also givers
of vegetation. The Erinyes had scarcely a recorded cult, and their
wrath was moralised as righteous indignation; nor was ghost-cult, when
it arose, merely a service of terror and aversion. It is a striking
confirmation of the view here expressed, that among the very long list
of cult-appellatives attached to the Greek divinities, some of which
have a moral value, there are only two doubtful examples of an evil
connotation attaching to the word.[145.1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account