The growing preference for the younger type can be traced in the lists
of athletic statues at Olympia recorded by Pausanias. There is a steady
increase during the fifth century of the proportion of boy victors as
compared with men, and the increase is more than maintained during the
fourth century. The change is perhaps connected with a change in the
character of athletics. There can be no doubt that athletics were
already becoming more specialized, and the specialized athlete did not
appeal to the artist of the fifth century. In the following age we find
an increasing diversity of type, but in the Periclean age the ideal of
athletic youth dominates all treatment of the human figure. We can see
it in the figures of children and young boys which, despite their small
stature, have the proportions and muscular development of men, or in the
figures of women which, whether undraped or, as was more usual, draped,
differ little in framework and proportion from the figures of graceful
youths. In the Periclean age, we cannot distinguish between the athlete
and the ephebos. Every educated youth is an athlete, and every athlete
is an educated youth and a citizen of a free state. Of the strictly
athletic statues unfortunately we possess only marble copies, which in
the transference from bronze have lost much of the grace of the
originals. But the ephebos is known to us from many a grave relief, and
above all from the sculptures of the Parthenon. The grave reliefs are at
least originals, though we do not know the artists’ names, while the
Parthenon sculptures were executed under the direction of Pheidias. A
truer idea of the athletic youth of this age can be formed from the
Theseus of the pediment, or the epheboi of the frieze, than from late
copies of Polycleitus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account