The defeat of Persia not only gave a fresh impulse to the Panhellenic
festivals: it raised athletic training into a national duty. The
consciousness of a great danger safely past arouses a nation to a sense
of its military and physical needs. We can remember only a few years ago
the growth of rifle clubs, the cry for military and physical training
that followed the Boer war. The danger, it is felt at such times, may
occur again, and it behoves every citizen to be ready to play his part.
Among the Greeks this feeling gathered force not from any consciousness
of their own shortcomings, but from a consciousness of their
superiority. At Marathon the Greeks of the mainland had for the first
time found themselves face to face with the Orientals, and for the first
time realized the gulf that separated them from themselves. Their
triumph was the triumph of freedom and law over slavery and despotism. A
handful of free citizens had defeated a horde of slaves, and this result
was due in no small degree to their athletic training. Witness the
famous charge of Marathon. Critics may throw doubt on its truth: it is
sufficient that Herodotus supposed it possible. An army charging a
distance of eight furlongs over ground that would try any cross-country
runner! No wonder the Persians regarded the Greeks as madmen. The mere
existence of such a story is proof enough of the athletic training of
the nation. Moreover, the sight of the long-haired, effeminate Persians,
whose bodies were not hardened by exercise and tanned by exposure to the
air, seems to have impressed itself indelibly on the national
imagination. Hence the extraordinary popularity during the years that
followed of all those military and athletic exercises which we see so
constantly depicted on the red-figured vases. We must remember that at
Athens this training was for the most part voluntary. It was only during
the two years’ training of the epheboi that the state undertook the
education of its members. Yet from this time the palaestra and gymnasium
became the resort of all classes and all ages. And what was true of
Athens, was true, we may feel sure, of the rest of Greece. For a time
Athenian influence prevailed everywhere. The old Spartan pre-eminence
had passed away, and even in athletics Athens had become the school of
Greece. If Athens produced few victors in the games, she at least set an
example in physical training. “Meet is it that from Athens a fashioner
of athletes come,” says Pindar of the Athenian Menander who trained
Pytheas of Aegina for a Nemean victory, won probably in 481 or 479
B.C.[114] The effect of this national athletic movement is seen in the
great games. The lists of the victors at Olympia, or the lists of those
for whom Bacchylides and Pindar sang, are representative of the length
and breadth of Greece from Rhodes to Agrigentum, from Cyrene to
Thasos.[115] Finally, the national rejoicing over the victory of Plataea
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account